Curious if anyone knows if anything like San Blaze has been used to test
btrfs?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
little to no way to actually get them?
On 10/31/2014 4:35 AM, Robert White wrote:
On 10/30/2014 06:30 AM, Zack Coffey wrote:
Rob, That second drive was immediately put to use elsewhere. I figured
having only the metadata on that drive, it wouldn't matter. The data
stayed single and wasn't part
7:07 PM, Robert White wrote:
On 10/29/2014 03:26 PM, Robert White wrote:
On 10/28/2014 01:32 PM, Zack Coffey wrote:
Made a RAID1 with another drive of just the metadata. Was in
that state for less than 12 hours-ish, removed the second drive and
now cannot get to any data on the original drive
2014 (5c4d099) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ btrfs --version
Btrfs v3.16.2+20141003
On 10/28/2014 11:55 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
'mount degraded,ro'
see if there is any non-zero non-raid1 group profile.
On 10/29/14 04:32, Zack Coffey wrote:
Revisit of a previous issue. Setup a single 640GB
Revisit of a previous issue. Setup a single 640GB drive with BTRFS and
compression. This was not a system drive, just a place to put random
junk.
Made a RAID1 with another drive of just the metadata. Was in
that state for less than 12 hours-ish, removed the second drive and
now cannot get to any
Revisit of a previous issue. Setup a single 640GB drive with BTRFS and
compression. This was not a system drive, just a place to put random
junk.
Made a RAID1 with another drive of just the metadata. Was in
that state for less than 12 hours-ish, removed the second drive and
now cannot get to any
Revisit of a previous issue. Setup a single 640GB drive with BTRFS and
compression. This was not a system drive, just a place to put random
junk.
Made a RAID1 with another drive of just the metadata. Was in
that state for less than 12 hours-ish, removed the second drive and
now cannot get to any
Revisit of a previous issue. Summary, single drive btrfs has lots of
data. Made a RAID1 with another drive of just the metadata. Was in
that state for less than 12 hours-ish, removed the second drive and
now cannot get to any data on the original drive.
Single drive btrfs was made on Ubuntu with
Revisit of a previous issue. Summary, single drive btrfs has lots of
data. Made a RAID1 with another drive of just the metadata. Was in
that state for less than 12 hours-ish, removed the second drive and
now cannot get to any data on the original drive.
Single drive btrfs was made on Ubuntu with
While I'm sure some of those settings were selected with good reason,
maybe there can be a few options (2 or 3) that have some basic
intelligence at creation to pick a more sane option.
Some checks to see if an option or two might be better suited for the
fs. Like the RAID5 stripe size. Leave the
Can I get more protection by using more than 2 drives?
I had an onboard RAID a few years back that would let me use RAID1
across up to 4 drives.
Apologies if this has been covered already, I don't recall seeing
anything saying yay or nay.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
11 matches
Mail list logo
