Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2011-09-19 15:59:52 -0400:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:30:02PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2011-09-19 13:52:03 -0400:
> > > > Thanks everyone, I've put Jeff's last version of this in my queue.
> > >
> > > Can you post t
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:30:02PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2011-09-19 13:52:03 -0400:
> > > Thanks everyone, I've put Jeff's last version of this in my queue.
> >
> > Can you post the version you merged? The previous ones all had issues.
>
> https://githu
Excerpts from Andi Kleen's message of 2011-09-19 13:52:03 -0400:
> > Thanks everyone, I've put Jeff's last version of this in my queue.
>
> Can you post the version you merged? The previous ones all had issues.
https://github.com/chrismason/linux/commit/48802c8ae2a9d618ec734a61283d645ad527e06c
T
> Thanks everyone, I've put Jeff's last version of this in my queue.
Can you post the version you merged? The previous ones all had issues.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Excerpts from Jeff liu's message of 2011-09-18 06:33:38 -0400:
>
> 在 2011-9-18,下午4:42, Marco Stornelli 写道:
>
> > Il 18/09/2011 09:29, Jeff Liu ha scritto:
> >> Hi Andreas and Andi,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your comments.
> >>
> >> On 09/18/2011 09:46 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>
> > with an addi
在 2011-9-18,下午4:42, Marco Stornelli 写道:
> Il 18/09/2011 09:29, Jeff Liu ha scritto:
>> Hi Andreas and Andi,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>> On 09/18/2011 09:46 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>
> with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
> file size, return -E
Il 18/09/2011 09:29, Jeff Liu ha scritto:
Hi Andreas and Andi,
Thanks for your comments.
On 09/18/2011 09:46 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
if (offset>= inode->i_size) {
Hi Andreas and Andi,
Thanks for your comments.
On 09/18/2011 09:46 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
>>> file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
>>>
>>>if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
>>>mutex_unl
> > with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
> > file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
> >
> >if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
> >mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> >return -ENXIO;
> >}
>
> E
On 2011-09-17, at 12:10 AM, Jeff Liu wrote:
> I once posted a similar patch for this issue which can be found at:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg12169.html
>
> with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
> file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
>
>
I once posted a similar patch for this issue which can be found at:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg12169.html
with an additional improvement if the offset is larger or equal to the
file size, return -ENXIO in directly:
if (offset >= inode->i_size) {
mutex_unlo
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:48:15AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:06:47PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen
> >
> > Introduced by 9a4327ca1f45f82edad7dc0a4e52ce9316e0950c
>
> I think this should go to Chris/Linus ASAP. But a slightly better
> patch desc
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:06:47PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> Introduced by 9a4327ca1f45f82edad7dc0a4e52ce9316e0950c
I think this should go to Chris/Linus ASAP. But a slightly better
patch description wouldn't hurt either.
Also any reason you captialize BTRFS?
>
> Signed
13 matches
Mail list logo