On 25-08-2015 16:17, Matt Ruffalo wrote:
> On 2015-08-25 09:44, Miguel Negrão wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> This weekend had my first btrfs horror story.
>>
>> system: 3.13.0-49-lowlatency, btrfs-progs v4.1.2
>>
>> A disclaimer: I know 3.13 is very out of date, but I the requirement of
>> keeping kerne
On 2015-08-25 10:59, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:44:12PM +, Miguel Negrão wrote:
Hi list,
This weekend had my first btrfs horror story.
system: 3.13.0-49-lowlatency, btrfs-progs v4.1.2
Sorry to say, but that's a very old kernels with many btrfs bugs, some
did lead to co
Hi Marc,
On 25-08-2015 15:59, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>> upgrading kernel requires upgrading ubuntu, which will upgrade a lot of
>> packages and might lead to problems which I don't have time to fix. One
>
> You're doing it wrong :)
> Upgrade/compile your own kernel without upgrading the OS.
>
I did
On 2015-08-25 09:44, Miguel Negrão wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This weekend had my first btrfs horror story.
>
> system: 3.13.0-49-lowlatency, btrfs-progs v4.1.2
>
> A disclaimer: I know 3.13 is very out of date, but I the requirement of
> keeping kernel up to date clashes with my requirement of keeping
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:44:12PM +, Miguel Negrão wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> This weekend had my first btrfs horror story.
>
> system: 3.13.0-49-lowlatency, btrfs-progs v4.1.2
Sorry to say, but that's a very old kernels with many btrfs bugs, some
did lead to corruption.
> A disclaimer: I kno
On 2015-08-25 10:26, Miguel Negrão wrote:
Austin S Hemmelgarn gmail.com> writes:
One comment I would like to make about this: I have heard numerous
stories of OCZ brand SSD's having significant data corruption issues
(along the lines of writes returning successful when they really failed,
and
Austin S Hemmelgarn gmail.com> writes:
> One comment I would like to make about this: I have heard numerous
> stories of OCZ brand SSD's having significant data corruption issues
> (along the lines of writes returning successful when they really failed,
> and blocks that are in use getting ran
On 2015-08-25 09:44, Miguel Negrão wrote:
Hi list,
This weekend had my first btrfs horror story.
system: 3.13.0-49-lowlatency, btrfs-progs v4.1.2
A disclaimer: I know 3.13 is very out of date, but I the requirement of
keeping kernel up to date clashes with my requirement of keeping a stable
sy
Hi list,
This weekend had my first btrfs horror story.
system: 3.13.0-49-lowlatency, btrfs-progs v4.1.2
A disclaimer: I know 3.13 is very out of date, but I the requirement of
keeping kernel up to date clashes with my requirement of keeping a stable
system. At the moment I can't disturb my syst
