04.06.2016 20:31, B. S. пишет:
>>>
>>> Yeah, when it comes to FDE, you either have to make your peace with
>>> trusting the manufacturer, or you can't. If you are going to boot
>>> your system with a traditional boot loader, an unencrypted partition
>>> is mandatory.
>>
>> No, it is not with grub2
04.06.2016 22:05, Chris Murphy пишет:
...
>>
>> Yeah, when it comes to FDE, you either have to make your peace with
>> trusting the manufacturer, or you can't. If you are going to boot your
>> system with a traditional boot loader, an unencrypted partition is
>> mandatory.
>
> /boot can be
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Justin Brown wrote:
> Here's some thoughts:
>
>> Assume a CD sized (680MB) /boot
>
> Some distros carry patches for grub that allow booting from Btrfs
Upstream GRUB has had Btrfs support for a long time. There's been no
need for distros
On 06/04/2016 03:46 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
04.06.2016 04:39, Justin Brown пишет:
Here's some thoughts:
Assume a CD sized (680MB) /boot
Some distros carry patches for grub that allow booting from Btrfs,
so no separate /boot file system is required. (Fedora does not;
Ubuntu -- and
04.06.2016 04:39, Justin Brown пишет:
> Here's some thoughts:
>
>> Assume a CD sized (680MB) /boot
>
> Some distros carry patches for grub that allow booting from Btrfs,
> so no separate /boot file system is required. (Fedora does not;
> Ubuntu -- and therefore probably all Debians -- does.)
>
On 06/03/2016 09:39 PM, Justin Brown wrote:
Here's some thoughts:
Assume a CD sized (680MB) /boot
Some distros carry patches for grub that allow booting from Btrfs,
so no separate /boot file system is required. (Fedora does not;
Ubuntu -- and therefore probably all Debians -- does.)
Here's some thoughts:
> Assume a CD sized (680MB) /boot
Some distros carry patches for grub that allow booting from Btrfs, so
no separate /boot file system is required. (Fedora does not; Ubuntu --
and therefore probably all Debians -- does.)
> perhaps a 200MB (?) sized EFI partition
Way bigger