Chris Mason, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:13:07 -0400:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
No, not stable!
Again, after powerloss, I have *two*
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:04:57PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
Chris Mason, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:13:07 -0400:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
No, not stable!
Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems.
Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail
testing here without problems, and corruptions after powerloss are very
often caused
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
No, not stable!
Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems.
Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail
testing here without
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
No, not stable!
Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems.
Please tell me more
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400
Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
No, not stable!
Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems.
Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:21:15PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400
Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote:
No, not stable!
Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:12 AM, K. Richard Pixley r...@noir.com wrote:
On 9/18/10 17:43 , C Anthony Risinger wrote:
I remeber someone recently using it for
continuous build servers successfully
That's probably me and I wouldn't call the effort successful yet. There
are at least several
On 9/18/10 17:43 , C Anthony Risinger wrote:
I remeber someone recently using it for
continuous build servers successfully
That's probably me and I wouldn't call the effort successful yet.
There are at least several outstanding problems including the limit on
the number of links to a file.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
- Original Message -
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
Hi all
I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following
progress for some more. Are
On 19/09/10 07:37, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following
progress for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs stabilizing,
as in terms of usability in production? If so, how far are we from this?
I've been using btrfs in anger for a
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
Hi all
I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following progress
for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs stabilizing, as in terms of
usability in production? If so, how far are we from
- Original Message -
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
Hi all
I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following
progress for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs stabilizing,
as in terms of usability in
On Sep 18, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net
wrote:
- Original Message -
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
Hi all
I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following
progress for some more. Are
Stable is a pretty subjective term; many don't even think ext4 is
stable. I've used it on my personal machine since .30-31-ish without
problems, and on a server w/raid 1 for about a year (btrfs + lxc is
niiice, for VMs) also free of problems.
However, if you've been on the list you know
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net
wrote:
Stable is a pretty subjective term; many don't even think ext4 is
stable. I've used it on my personal machine since .30-31-ish without
problems, and on a server w/raid 1 for about a year (btrfs + lxc is
niiice,
16 matches
Mail list logo