Re: Question of stability

2010-09-22 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Chris Mason, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:13:07 -0400: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: No, not stable! Again, after powerloss, I have *two*

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-22 Thread Chris Mason
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:04:57PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Chris Mason, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:13:07 -0400: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Chris Mason
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: No, not stable! Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail testing here without problems, and corruptions after powerloss are very often caused

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Lubos Kolouch
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: No, not stable! Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail testing here without

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Chris Mason
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:10:08PM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: No, not stable! Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. Please tell me more

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Stephan von Krawczynski
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: No, not stable! Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs filesystems. Please tell me more about your system. I do extensive power fail

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread Chris Mason
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 02:21:15PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:30:57 -0400 Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:00:08AM +, Lubos Kolouch wrote: No, not stable! Again, after powerloss, I have *two* damaged btrfs

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:12 AM, K. Richard Pixley r...@noir.com wrote:  On 9/18/10 17:43 , C Anthony Risinger wrote: I remeber someone recently using it for continuous build servers successfully That's probably me and I wouldn't call the effort successful yet.  There are at least several

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-20 Thread K. Richard Pixley
On 9/18/10 17:43 , C Anthony Risinger wrote: I remeber someone recently using it for continuous build servers successfully That's probably me and I wouldn't call the effort successful yet. There are at least several outstanding problems including the limit on the number of links to a file.

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-19 Thread Hugo Mills
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:55:34AM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: - Original Message - On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote: Hi all I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following progress for some more. Are

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-19 Thread Chris Samuel
On 19/09/10 07:37, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following progress for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs stabilizing, as in terms of usability in production? If so, how far are we from this? I've been using btrfs in anger for a

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread Hendrik Fabelje
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote: Hi all I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following progress for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs stabilizing, as in terms of usability in production? If so, how far are we from

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
- Original Message - On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote: Hi all I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following progress for some more. Are there any chances of btrfs stabilizing, as in terms of usability in

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Sep 18, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote: - Original Message - On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote: Hi all I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following progress for some more. Are

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
Stable is a pretty subjective term; many don't even think ext4 is stable. I've used it on my personal machine since .30-31-ish without problems, and on a server w/raid 1 for about a year (btrfs + lxc is niiice, for VMs) also free of problems. However, if you've been on the list you know

Re: Question of stability

2010-09-18 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net wrote: Stable is a pretty subjective term; many don't even think ext4 is stable. I've used it on my personal machine since .30-31-ish without problems, and on a server w/raid 1 for about a year (btrfs + lxc is niiice,