Hi,
thanks for stepping up.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:24:46PM -0400, Vincent Olivier wrote:
> As for the work on "Gotchas/Known Issues" on the Btrfs wiki, I also
> think that the best way is to start with the Gotchas page and put a
> more prominent link for it on the home page.
Agreed.
> I wou
I'm still parsing through the multi-device advices. Will be back on this when
I'm done. And I'll probably switch distro to Archlinux which seems the way to
go if one is using cutting-edge kernel features like Btrfs.
As for the work on "Gotchas/Known Issues" on the Btrfs wiki, I also think that
; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:16:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55dc8f96.2010...@gmail.com>
References: <1440516154.040713...@apps.rackspace.com>
<55dc8f96.2010...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:16:13 -0700
Message-ID:
Subject: Re: Response to Bcachefs Claims
From: Suman Chakravar
Vincent Olivier posted on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:22:34 -0400 as excerpted:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using Btrfs for almost a year now with a 16x4TB RAID10 and
> its 8x4TB RAID0 backup (using incremental snapshots diffs). I have
> always tried to stay at the latest stable kernel (currently 4.1.6). But
>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2015-08-25 11:22, Vincent Olivier wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have been using Btrfs for almost a year now with a 16x4TB RAID10 and its
>> 8x4TB RAID0 backup (using incremental snapshots diffs). I have always tried
>> to stay at the late
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2015-08-25 12:39, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> The one problem case I still have with the latest versions is multiple
>> device Btrfs volume UUID doesn't exist when 1 or more devices are
>> missing.
>
> I've seen this myself, but only so
On 2015-08-25 12:39, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Vincent Olivier wrote:
For my own sake and other's I would like to maintain (if nobody is already
working on that nor needs any help) a centralized human-readable digest of
known issues that would be featured prominent
On 2015-08-25 12:13, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:22:34 -0400 (EDT)
"Vincent Olivier" wrote:
"UUID=" won't work for unknown reasons (haven't got a reply on this, maybe
it's the same as "LABEL="). And I will use /dev/* in fstab for stability
reasons.
Take a look at the contents
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Vincent Olivier wrote:
> For my own sake and other's I would like to maintain (if nobody is already
> working on that nor needs any help) a centralized human-readable digest of
> known issues that would be featured prominently on top of the Btrfs wiki. I
> woul
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:22:34AM -0400, Vincent Olivier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using Btrfs for almost a year now with a 16x4TB RAID10 and
> its 8x4TB RAID0 backup (using incremental snapshots diffs). I have
> always tried to stay at the latest stable kernel (currently 4.1.6).
> But I might
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:22:34 -0400 (EDT)
"Vincent Olivier" wrote:
> "UUID=" won't work for unknown reasons (haven't got a reply on this, maybe
> it's the same as "LABEL="). And I will use /dev/* in fstab for stability
> reasons.
Take a look at the contents of /dev/disk/by-id/, specifically ata-
On 2015-08-25 11:22, Vincent Olivier wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Btrfs for almost a year now with a 16x4TB RAID10 and its
8x4TB RAID0 backup (using incremental snapshots diffs). I have always tried to
stay at the latest stable kernel (currently 4.1.6). But I might be moving to
Fedora 22 beca
Hi,
I have been using Btrfs for almost a year now with a 16x4TB RAID10 and its
8x4TB RAID0 backup (using incremental snapshots diffs). I have always tried to
stay at the latest stable kernel (currently 4.1.6). But I might be moving to
Fedora 22 because Centos 7 has significant incompatibilities
13 matches
Mail list logo
