Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-09-01 Thread Chris Murphy
; >> -Original Message- >> >> From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs- >> >> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Murphy >> >> Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 7:59 AM >> >> To: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kern

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-09-01 Thread Chris Murphy
OK I filed a bug: progs 4.7.x, numerous incorrect backrefs are not fixed with --repair https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155791 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

RE: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-09-01 Thread Paul Jones
nel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs- > >> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Murphy > >> Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 7:59 AM > >> To: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org> > >> Subject: Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local &g

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-09-01 Thread Chris Murphy
OK so I have a 2nd volume, which is only ever used to 'btrfs receive' from the 1st volume. The 2nd volume is never persistently mounted. But it too has bunches of these incorrect backref messages, where btrfs-progs 4.6.1 comes up clean. A 3rd volume, is only ever used to receive rsync from the 1st

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-09-01 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > OK so I have a 2nd volume, which is only ever used to 'btrfs receive' > from the 1st volume. The 2nd volume is never persistently mounted. But > it too has bunches of these incorrect backref messages, where >

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-09-01 Thread Chris Murphy
gt;> To: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org> >> Subject: Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref >> count" messages >> >> This is still happening with btrfs-progs 4.7.1 and there is zero information >> in >> the lon

RE: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-09-01 Thread Paul Jones
> -Original Message- > From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Murphy > Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 7:59 AM > To: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-08-31 Thread Chris Murphy
This is still happening with btrfs-progs 4.7.1 and there is zero information in the long result what to do about the problem, and whether it's sane to try have --repair fix it, let alone what the original cause of the problem was. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-08-24 Thread Chris Murphy
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Plugging in the 'btrfs check' reporte backrefs into btrfs-debug-tree > > [chris@f24s ~]$ sudo btrfs-debug-tree -b 16913485824 /dev/mapper/brick1 > btrfs-progs v4.7 > checksum verify failed on 16913485824 found

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-08-24 Thread Chris Murphy
[chris@f24s ~]$ btrfs --version btrfs-progs v4.5.3 [chris@f24s ~]$ sudo btrfs check /dev/mapper/brick1 Checking filesystem on /dev/mapper/brick1 UUID: 30f4724a-9a9f-4a5d-a37d-3e53876bf2e1 checking extents checking free space cache checking fs roots checking csums checking root refs found

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-08-24 Thread Chris Murphy
Plugging in the 'btrfs check' reporte backrefs into btrfs-debug-tree [chris@f24s ~]$ sudo btrfs-debug-tree -b 16913485824 /dev/mapper/brick1 btrfs-progs v4.7 checksum verify failed on 16913485824 found FEAA7A13 wanted 2000 checksum verify failed on 16913485824 found FEAA7A13 wanted 2000

Re: btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-08-24 Thread Chris Murphy
[chris@f24s ~]$ sudo btrfs dev stats /brick1 [/dev/mapper/brick1].write_io_errs 0 [/dev/mapper/brick1].read_io_errs0 [/dev/mapper/brick1].flush_io_errs 0 [/dev/mapper/brick1].corruption_errs 0 [/dev/mapper/brick1].generation_errs 0 [chris@f24s ~]$ sudo btrfs scrub status /brick1 scrub

btrfs-progs 4.7, check reports many "incorrect local backref count" messages

2016-08-24 Thread Chris Murphy
See attached for 'btrfs check' output. The last check was about two weeks ago when btrfs-progs 4.7 was released, and it came up clean. The file system has only been written to since then with a 4.7.0 kernel, and 4.7.2 kernel for the past ~36 hours. The workload in those two weeks has only been