On 2017年08月08日 21:19, Janos Toth F. wrote:
I think you should consider using Linux 4.12 which has bfq (bfq-mq)
for blk-mq. So, you don't need out-of-tree BFQ patches if you switch
to blk-mq (but now you are free to do so even if you have HDDs or SSDs
which benefit from software schedulers since
On 08.08.2017 15:19, Janos Toth F. wrote:
I think you should consider using Linux 4.12 which has bfq (bfq-mq)
for blk-mq. So, you don't need out-of-tree BFQ patches if you switch
to blk-mq (but now you are free to do so even if you have HDDs or SSDs
which benefit from software schedulers since y
I think you should consider using Linux 4.12 which has bfq (bfq-mq)
for blk-mq. So, you don't need out-of-tree BFQ patches if you switch
to blk-mq (but now you are free to do so even if you have HDDs or SSDs
which benefit from software schedulers since you have some multi-queue
schedulers for them)
Hello everyone
I am looking for a way to test different available schedulers with
Manjaro's bfq-patched kernels on sytems with both SSD and spinning
drives. Since phoronix-test-suite apparently is currently useless for
this task due to its bad config for bfq I am looking for alternatives.
Do
