On wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:26:02 -0500, Sylvain Alain wrote:
Hi guys, I noticed that now my snapshot take a long time to process :
sylvain@gentootux ~ $ df -h
Sys. de fichiers Taille Utilisé Dispo Uti% Monté sur
rootfs 112G4,0G 103G 4% /
/dev/sda4 112G4,0G 103G
merc1...@f-m.fm wrote (ao):
Oh pardon me, it's BTRFS RAID that's a no-go, which is just as critical
to me as I have a 4 disk 8TB array.
The FAQ goeth on to Say:
---
This pretty much forbids you to use btrfs' cool RAID features if you
Hello folk,
The btrfs file system, part of the linux kernel, is vulnerable to a
trivial hash-DoS attack. More details can be found here:
http://crypto.junod.info/2012/12/13/hash-dos-and-btrfs/
Enjoy!
Pascal Junod
--
http://crypto.junod.info
@cryptopathe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:41:50PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:50:54AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Two things:
*nod*
I think Zach was asking about the userspace tools, not the kernel
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012, at 1:17, Sander wrote:
Forbids? That is just plain wrong.
I have one btrfs filesystem on top of two encrypted devices. Works just
fine.
That's dynamite Sander.
But I am not going to contravene the instructions, then have problems,
only to come back here and have fingers
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:56:10AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Yes, I've got the big raid56 push ready to go out, and I've just been
trying to test it all. I'll put that in a raid branch and get the fixes
onto master.
Thanks.
I was asking because it's pretty annoying to go through patchwork
[ adding linux-btrfs ]
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:56:37AM -0700, Pascal Junod wrote:
Hello folk,
The btrfs file system, part of the linux kernel, is vulnerable to a
trivial hash-DoS attack. More details can be found here:
http://crypto.junod.info/2012/12/13/hash-dos-and-btrfs/
Hi Pascal,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:50:40PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:56:10AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Yes, I've got the big raid56 push ready to go out, and I've just been
trying to test it all. I'll put that in a raid branch and get the fixes
onto master.
Thanks.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:52:08PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to write this up. As far as I can tell, the
looping was actually fixed in an older kernel and I just misread our
version string in your original email.
Yeah, the blogpost says 3.3.7. I did a quick test
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 02:34:30PM -0700, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:52:08PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to write this up. As far as I can tell, the
looping was actually fixed in an older kernel and I just misread our
version string in your
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:23:05AM -0800, merc1...@f-m.fm wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012, at 1:17, Sander wrote:
Forbids? That is just plain wrong.
I have one btrfs filesystem on top of two encrypted devices. Works just
fine.
That's dynamite Sander.
But I am not going to contravene the
11 matches
Mail list logo