Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6164!

(2011/06/07 14:59), Tsutomu Itoh wrote: > Hi liubo, > > (2011/06/07 14:31), liubo wrote: >> On 06/06/2011 04:33 PM, Tsutomu Itoh wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I encountered following panic using 'btrfs-unstable + for-linus' >>> kernel. >>> >>> I ran "btrfs fi bal /test5" command, and mount option of /tes

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6164!

Hi liubo, (2011/06/07 14:31), liubo wrote: > On 06/06/2011 04:33 PM, Tsutomu Itoh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I encountered following panic using 'btrfs-unstable + for-linus' >> kernel. >> >> I ran "btrfs fi bal /test5" command, and mount option of /test5 >> is as follows: >> >> /dev/sdc3 on /test5 type

Re: btrfs hang on brd

On 03/06/11 12:41, Adrian Hunter wrote: No improvement on 3.0-rc1+ (commit 5c6cce92bc8aee751aafe82c5d9caf7553226a3d). And on 59c5f46fbe01a00eedf54a23789634438bb80603 Linux 3.0-rc2 btrfs quickly fails to mount due to no space e.g. Script -- #!/bin/sh sudo modprobe brd rd_size=262144 sud

Re: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6164!

On 06/06/2011 04:33 PM, Tsutomu Itoh wrote: > Hi, > > I encountered following panic using 'btrfs-unstable + for-linus' > kernel. > > I ran "btrfs fi bal /test5" command, and mount option of /test5 > is as follows: > > /dev/sdc3 on /test5 type btrfs (rw,space_cache,compress=lzo,inode_cache) >

Re: Delayed inode operations not doing the right thing with enospc

On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box > > [ 9792.654889] [ cut here ] > [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 > btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() > [ 9792.654899] Hardwa

Applications using fsync cause hangs for several seconds every few minutes

Hello list, I've been using btrfs on my personal machines for about two years now, and on this machine for about a year with absolutely no problems. Infact, it has held up better than ext4 with regards to reliability. However, recently, perhaps with 2.6.39, or after I quickly started filling up m

[PATCH] Btrfs: account for space reservations properly

We have been using space_info->bytes_reserved in the metadata case to cover our reservations for ENOSPC. The problem with this is thats horribly wrong. We use bytes_reserved to keep track of how many bytes the allocator has outstanding that haven't actually been made into extents yet. So what ha

Re: Announcing btrfs-gui

Excerpts from Hugo Mills's message of 2011-06-01 19:20:58 -0400: >Over the last few weeks, I've been playing with a foolish idea, > mostly triggered by a cluster of people being confused by btrfs's free > space reporting (df vs btrfs fi df vs btrfs fi show). I also wanted an > excuse, and some

Re: New btrfsck status

Chris Mason on 10 Feb 13:17: > Excerpts from Ben Gamari's message of 2011-02-09 21:52:20 -0500: > > Over the last several months there have been many claims regarding > > the release of the rewritten btrfsck. Unfortunately, despite > > numerous claims that it will be released Real Soon Now(c), I ha

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:4676!

Hello, the issue happens every time when i have to hard power-off my notebook (suspend problems). With kernel 2.6.39 the partition is unmountable, solution is to boot 2.6.38 kernel which 1/ is able to mount the partition, 2/ by doing that fixes the problem so later .39 (after clean shutdown)

kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6164!

Hi, I encountered following panic using 'btrfs-unstable + for-linus' kernel. I ran "btrfs fi bal /test5" command, and mount option of /test5 is as follows: /dev/sdc3 on /test5 type btrfs (rw,space_cache,compress=lzo,inode_cache) Thanks, Tsutomu