Am Samstag, 20. April 2013 schrieb Josef Bacik:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 03:15:30AM -0600, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 16. April 2013 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
On Saturday 13 April 2013 17:48:31 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hi!
Please answer soon whether it would be a
Am Samstag, 20. April 2013 schrieb Josef Bacik:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 03:15:30AM -0600, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Dienstag, 16. April 2013 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
On Saturday 13 April 2013 17:48:31 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Hi!
Please answer soon whether it would be a
Hi,
I have experienced an error message about stale NFS files when looking
into a directory.
ls -la manpages-dev.md5sums
ls: cannot access manpages-dev.md5sums: Stale NFS file handle
root@c3po:/media/revo/@/var/lib/dpkg/info# rm manpages-dev.md5sums
rm: cannot remove ‘manpages-dev.md5sums’:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com wrote:
On 4/19/13 7:11 PM, Jon Nelson wrote:
The following is a minor patch to cmds-restore.c
Hi Jon - just a note -
When sending a patch like this, it's best to follow the standard
patch format, which closely mimics the
Using 3.8.8, I tried mounting with -o recovery and -o
recovery,nospace_cache (which shouldn't be any different, if I'm
understanding the kernel sources properly) without any benefit.
Then I tried btrfs-next ( bba653d1207646b17671c6cb9a0629736811848a as
of this writing ) also without being able to
From: Wang Shilong wangsl-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
ulist is a generic structure to iterate tree. we export them
just in the hope it may be used by other modules. However, until
now, it is just used by btrfs. The main point is that ulist_{init,fin}()
should be only called by
Hello Eric,
Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which
are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout.
removed functions:
btrfs_iref_to_path()
__btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item()
__btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item()
Am Samstag, 20. April 2013 schrieb Josef Bacik:
So I found your bug on the plane ride, as soon as I get home I'll email
it. Thanks,
I have redone my BTRFS now.
But I have a dd image copy on my backup drive in case you have something to
try out for me.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald
Hi,
The following series of patches implements in btrfs an ioctl to do
offline deduplication of file extents.
I am a fan of this patch, the API is just right. I just have a few
tweaks to suggest to the argument checking.
At first the 1M limitation on the length was a bit inconvenient, but
On 04/19/13 21:21, Eric Sandeen wrote:
Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which
are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout.
removed functions:
btrfs_iref_to_path()
__btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item()
__btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item()
On 4/20/13 7:43 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
From: Wang Shilong wangsl-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
ulist is a generic structure to iterate tree. we export them
just in the hope it may be used by other modules. However, until
now, it is just used by btrfs. The main point is that ulist_{init,fin}()
should
On 04/20/13 19:43, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 4/20/13 7:43 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
From: Wang Shilong wangsl-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
ulist is a generic structure to iterate tree. we export them
just in the hope it may be used by other modules. However, until
now, it is just used by btrfs. The main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there any particular reason why I can't use DUP for data?
When I try to set it with balance there is a kernel message:
btrfs: dup for data is not allowed
The glossary at https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Glossary says:
Regular data
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:17:06PM -0700, Roger Binns wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there any particular reason why I can't use DUP for data?
Technically, no. Performance is likely to suck if you use
rotational disks, and you may find some SSDs deduplicate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/04/13 13:48, Hugo Mills wrote: On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:17:06PM
- -0700, Roger Binns wrote:
Is there any particular reason why I can't use DUP for data?
Technically, no. Performance is likely to suck if you use rotational
disks, and you
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 02:15:14PM -0700, Roger Binns wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/04/13 13:48, Hugo Mills wrote: On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:17:06PM
- -0700, Roger Binns wrote:
When I try to set it with balance there is a kernel message:
btrfs: dup for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/04/13 14:23, Hugo Mills wrote:
You should upgrade anyway -- there's been a number of serious bugs in
btrfs fixed since then.
13.04 is imminent so I'll pick up a newer kernel as part of that anyway.
(Also Tanglu which I hope to move to intends
On 04/03/13 01:37, zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wuwu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Since raid5/6 support was introduced, we should update mkfs.btrfs help info.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wuwu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
mkfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
On 4/20/13 4:13 PM, Frank A. Kingswood wrote:
On 04/03/13 01:37, zwu.ker...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zhi Yong Wuwu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Since raid5/6 support was introduced, we should update mkfs.btrfs help
info.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wuwu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
mkfs.c | 2 +-
19 matches
Mail list logo
