On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:46:55 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy
to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio
scsi driver). There were two bugs that caused this problem:
- We might allocate new
Whats needed is more comprehensive btrfs fi show
which shows the flags (including missing) per disk.
And also show the FS/Raid status. Which I am working on.
sorry -p feature would be covered by default in the
coming revamp of btrfs fi show.
Thanks, Anand
On 02/07/2014 02:46 PM, Qu
IMO btrfs-progs shouldn't add its intelligence to know if disk
is missing. If btrfs-kernel doesn't know when disk is missing
that's a bug to fix in btrfs-kernel. yes that indeed true as
of now in btrfs-kernel. btrfs kernel has no idea when disk
goes missing, just -EIO doesn't tell btrfs
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:14:42 +0100, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:46:55 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy
to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio
scsi driver). There were two
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 17:17:45 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
On Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:14:42 +0100, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:46:55 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very
easy
to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on
Thanks for the comments.
mainly here sysfs way defeats the purpose - debug as
mentioned. Sysfs would/should show only mounted disks,
the ioctl way doesn't have such a limitation (of course
as I commented memory dump way would have been best choice
but I got stuck with that approach if
Am Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2014, 22:30:46 schrieb Chris Murphy:
On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:40 PM, Roman Mamedov r...@romanrm.net wrote:
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:54:19 +0100
Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@libero.it wrote:
I agree with you about the needing of a solution. However your patch to
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
[1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests
[1.627004] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests
[2.289182] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2299.967 MHz
[ 292.084537] kthreadd invoked oom-killer:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:45:09 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
Not exactly what I intended.
If echo fails, it will output some kind of error message, and that
will cause the golden image mismatch.
Fair enough. I'll resend with the two ' || echo failed to create src'
checks removed. Thanks again
This test uses the newly added cloner binary to dispatch full file and
range specific clone (reflink) requests.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp dd...@suse.de
---
tests/btrfs/035 | 77 +
tests/btrfs/035.out | 3 +++
tests/btrfs/group | 1
This patch-set provides a reproducer for hitting the 3.14.0-rc1 BUG_ON()
at:
692 int __btrfs_drop_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
...
839 /*
840 * | range to drop - |
841 * | extent |
842
The cloner program is capable of cloning files using the BTRFS_IOC_CLONE
and BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE ioctls.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp dd...@suse.de
---
.gitignore | 1 +
src/Makefile | 2 +-
src/cloner.c | 188 +++
3 files
Hi Dave,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:18:31PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:10:08AM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
+$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
+ $SCRATCH_MNT/snap_1 $seqres.full 21
+
+do_snapshots
+snapshots_pid=$!
+
Is there anything else I should do with this setup or may I nuke the
two partitions and reuse them?
2014-02-03 Johan Kröckel johan.kroec...@gmail.com:
State is: I wont use this filesystem again. I have a backup. So I am
interested to give the necessary information for debuging it and
Check for the btrfsprogs-devel ioctl.h header at configure time. Use it
in src/cloner if present, otherwise fall back to using the copied clone
ioctl definitions.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp dd...@suse.de
---
configure.ac | 1 +
src/cloner.c | 4
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
[1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests
[1.627004] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests
[2.289182] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration:
I am Mrs. Aisha Al Mutasim from England, I have a business proposal worth of
$10.6M US Dollars get
back for more info.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Added in patch btrfs: add ioctls to query/change feature bits online
modifications to superblock don't need to reserve metadata blocks when
starting a transaction.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Introduce a block group type bit for a global reserve and fill the space
info for SPACE_INFO ioctl. This should replace the newly added ioctl
(01e219e8069516cdb98594d417b8bb8d906ed30d) to get just the 'size' part
of the global reserve, while the actual usage can be now visible in the
'btrfs fi df'
From: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
The set_fslabel ioctl uses btrfs_end_transaction, which means it's
possible that the change will be lost if the system crashes, same for
the newly set features. Let's use btrfs_commit_transaction instead.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
Signed-off-by:
This reverts commit 01e219e8069516cdb98594d417b8bb8d906ed30d.
The information from the removed ioctl is newly provided by the existing
SPACE_INFO ioctl where it logically belongs and needs only minor changes
to the userspace code.
The GLOBAL_RSV ioctl hasn't been used anywhere yet, introduced
Two minor fixes to the new sysfs code and a RFC change to replace the
GLOBAL_RSV ioctl with the same information exported through SPACE_INFO ioctl.
This requires to reserve a blockgroup type that will become part of ABI.
David Sterba (3):
btrfs: reserve no transaction units in
On 06/02/14 19:54, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Roman
On 02/06/2014 01:45 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
There's not a lot of code to include (as my 3-line patch demonstrates), it
could just as easily be removed when it's obsolete. But I did not have any
high hopes of defeating the broken by design
From: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Btrfs would fail to send if snapshot run concurrently, this test is to make
sure we have fixed the bug.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
v3-v4:
avoid to use silent send command(thanks to Dave Chinner)
rename patch's
On Fri 07 Feb 2014 07:10:38 AM EST, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
[1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests
[1.627004] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests
[
Change the definition of BUG() to use assert instead of abort to
provide information about the location of the issue.
Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org
---
kerncompat.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kerncompat.h b/kerncompat.h
index
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Chris Mason c...@fb.com wrote:
On Fri 07 Feb 2014 07:10:38 AM EST, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
[1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests
[
Sometimes it is useful to see what btrfs restore is going to do
before provisioning enough external storage to restore onto.
Add a dry-run option so we can see what files and paths are found
by restore, without actually restoring any data.
---
cmds-restore.c | 14 --
1 file changed,
Tests Btrfs filesystems with all possible metadata block sizes, by
setting large extended attributes on files.
Signed-off-by: Koen De Wit koen.de@oracle.com
---
tests/btrfs/036 | 128 +++
tests/btrfs/036.out |7 +++
tests/btrfs/group
When I converted the BUG_ON() for the free_space_cache_inode in cow_file_range I
made it so we just return an error instead of unlocking all of our various
stuff. This is a mistake and causes us to hang when we run into this. This
patch fixes this problem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
failure from integration-20140207:
[CC] cmds-filesystem.o
cmds-filesystem.c: In function 'handle_print':
cmds-filesystem.c:434:5: error: too few arguments to function 'print_one_fs'
space_info_arg, label, mnt);
^
cmds-filesystem.c:361:12: note: declared here
static int print_one_fs
On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Roman Mamedov r...@romanrm.net wrote:
And what
if I am accessing that partition on a server via a network CIFS/NFS share and
don't even *have a way to find out* any of that.
That's the strongest argument. And if the user is using
Explorer/Finder/Nautilus to
The return value in process_one_leaf could be over-written while
looping over the items in the leaf.
This patch will preserve a non-zero return value to the calling
function if a non-zero return value is encountered in the loop.
The return value of one (1) is consistent with non-zero values
that
A user reported a 100% cpu hang with my new delayed ref code. Turns out I
forgot to increase the count check when we can't run a delayed ref because of
the tree mod log. If we can't run any delayed refs during this there is no
point in continuing to look, and we need to break out. Thanks,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:38:22AM +, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
Building the latest integration snapshot, I get the following failure:
...
[CC] cmds-filesystem.o
cmds-filesystem.c: In function 'cmd_show':
cmds-filesystem.c:740:12: error: invalid storage class for function
On Feb 7, 2014, at 4:34 AM, Johan Kröckel johan.kroec...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anything else I should do with this setup or may I nuke the
two partitions and reuse them?
Well I'm pretty sure once you run 'btrfs check --repair' that you've hit the
end of the road. Possibly btrfs restore
Josef Bacik jba...@fb.com schrieb:
On 02/05/2014 03:15 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
Hello,
On a freshly-created RAID1 filesystem of two 1TB disks:
# df -h /mnt/p2/
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2 1.8T 1.1M 1.8T 1% /mnt/p2
I cannot write 2TB of user
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com schrieb:
If the database/virtual machine/whatever is crash safe, then the
atomic state that a snapshot grabs will be useful.
How fast is this state fixed on disk from the time of the snapshot
command? Loosely speaking. I'm curious if this is 1 second; a
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
[1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests
[1.627004] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests
[2.289182]
On Feb 7, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Kai Krakow hurikhan77+bt...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com schrieb:
If the database/virtual machine/whatever is crash safe, then the
atomic state that a snapshot grabs will be useful.
How fast is this state fixed on disk from the time of
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net schrieb:
The question here is: Does it really make sense to create such snapshots
of disk images currently online and running a system. They will probably
be broken anyway after rollback - or at least I'd not fully trust the
contents.
VM images should not be
On my workstation, which unfortunately I can't easily upgrade the kernel on,
so it's running 3.8.0 for now, I've had pretty perpelexing hangs from btrfs
snapshot
when I make a new snapshot every hour.
I see the btrfs snapshot command in iotop for over a minute, and it completes
eventually.
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com schrieb:
On Feb 7, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Kai Krakow hurikhan77+bt...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com schrieb:
If the database/virtual machine/whatever is crash safe, then the
atomic state that a snapshot grabs will be useful.
How
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 06:14:45PM +0100, Koen De Wit wrote:
Tests Btrfs filesystems with all possible metadata block sizes, by
setting large extended attributes on files.
Signed-off-by: Koen De Wit koen.de@oracle.com
There's a few things here that need fixing.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 08:05:14AM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:50:25PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
So I used to use hardlinks to do historical backups of the same filesystem
but I know it's preferable to use refllink with btrfs to avoid having too
many hardlinks.
Hi Josef,
[..SNIP..]
Yeah, very reasonable, if you don't mind, i would give a patch for this
issue.
Go for it, you'll be faster than I will be, all I do is run xfstests and
try to reproduce things that will never reproduce for me.
So Finally, i've figured everything out.
Previous send is
Kai Krakow posted on Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:26:34 +0100 as excerpted:
So the question is: Do btrfs snapshots give the same guarantees on the
filesystem level that write-barriers give on the storage level which
exactly those processes rely upon? The cleanest solution would be if
processes could
Given now we have 2 spinlock for management of delayed refs,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y helped me find this,
[ 4723.413809] BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#1, btrfs-transacti/2258
[ 4723.414882] lock: 0x880048377670, .magic: dead4ead, .owner:
btrfs-transacti/2258, .owner_cpu: 2
[ 4723.417146]
Given now we have 2 spinlock for management of delayed refs,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y helped me find this,
[ 4723.413809] BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#1, btrfs-transacti/2258
[ 4723.414882] lock: 0x880048377670, .magic: dead4ead, .owner:
btrfs-transacti/2258, .owner_cpu: 2
[ 4723.417146]
49 matches
Mail list logo
