Re: Opps.. Should be 4.9/4.10 Experiences

2017-02-17 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2017-02-17 03:26, Duncan wrote: Imran Geriskovan posted on Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:42:09 +0200 as excerpted: Opps.. I mean 4.9/4.10 Experiences On 2/16/17, Imran Geriskovan wrote: What are your experiences for btrfs regarding 4.10 and 4.11 kernels? I'm still on

Re: Opps.. Should be 4.9/4.10 Experiences

2017-02-17 Thread Duncan
Imran Geriskovan posted on Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:42:09 +0200 as excerpted: > Opps.. I mean 4.9/4.10 Experiences > > On 2/16/17, Imran Geriskovan wrote: >> What are your experiences for btrfs regarding 4.10 and 4.11 kernels? >> I'm still on 4.8.x. I'd be happy to hear

Opps.. Should be 4.9/4.10 Experiences

2017-02-16 Thread Imran Geriskovan
Opps.. I mean 4.9/4.10 Experiences On 2/16/17, Imran Geriskovan wrote: > What are your experiences for btrfs regarding 4.10 and 4.11 kernels? > I'm still on 4.8.x. I'd be happy to hear from anyone using 4.1x for > a very typical single disk setup. Are they reasonably