Re: anything wrong with `balance -dusage -musage` together?

2015-11-19 Thread Lukas Pirl
On 11/20/2015 12:59 PM, Hugo Mills wrote as excerpted: >Nothing actively wrong with that, no. It certainly won't break > anything. It's just rarely actually useful. The usual situation is > that you run out of one kind of storage before the other (data vs > metadata, that is), and you need to

Re: anything wrong with `balance -dusage -musage` together?

2015-11-19 Thread Hugo Mills
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:53:33PM +1300, Lukas Pirl wrote: > Hi list, > > I rarely see balance used with -dusage -musage together, esp. with > values other than zero. > > The question is, is there anything wrong with running (say) `balance > -dusage=50 -musage=30` regularly? Nothing

anything wrong with `balance -dusage -musage` together?

2015-11-19 Thread Lukas Pirl
Hi list, I rarely see balance used with -dusage -musage together, esp. with values other than zero. The question is, is there anything wrong with running (say) `balance -dusage=50 -musage=30` regularly? Thanks and best regards, Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: anything wrong with `balance -dusage -musage` together?

2015-11-19 Thread Duncan
Lukas Pirl posted on Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:53:33 +1300 as excerpted: > I rarely see balance used with -dusage -musage together, esp. with > values other than zero. > > The question is, is there anything wrong with running (say) `balance > -dusage=50 -musage=30` regularly? I see the question in