On 2017-05-15 04:14, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 04:16:52PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:21:11PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
2) balance -musage=0
3) balance -musage=20
In most cases, this is going to make ENOSPC problems worse, not
better. The reason for
Le 15/05/2017 à 10:14, Hugo Mills a écrit :
> [...]
>> As for limit= I'm not sure if it would be helpful since I run this
>> nightly. Anything that doesn't get done tonight due to limit, would be
>> done tomorrow?
>I'm suggesting limit= on its own. It's a fixed amount of work
> compared to
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 04:16:52PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:21:11PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > > 2) balance -musage=0
> > > 3) balance -musage=20
> >
> >In most cases, this is going to make ENOSPC problems worse, not
> > better. The reason for doign this kind
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:21:11PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > 2) balance -musage=0
> > 3) balance -musage=20
>
>In most cases, this is going to make ENOSPC problems worse, not
> better. The reason for doign this kind of balance is to recover unused
> space and allow it to be reallocated.
Le 14/05/2017 à 23:30, Kai Krakow a écrit :
> Am Sun, 14 May 2017 22:57:26 +0200
> schrieb Lionel Bouton :
>
>> I've coded one Ruby script which tries to balance between the cost of
>> reallocating group and the need for it.[...]
>> Given its current size, I should
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 22:57:26 +0200
schrieb Lionel Bouton :
> I've coded one Ruby script which tries to balance between the cost of
> reallocating group and the need for it. The basic idea is that it
> tries to keep the proportion of free space "wasted" by being
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 01:15:09PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > On 05/13/2017 10:54 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > > Kernel 4.11, btrfs-progs v4.7.3
> > >
> > > I run scrub and balance every night, been doing this for 1.5 years
Am Sun, 14 May 2017 13:15:09 -0700
schrieb Marc MERLIN :
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > On 05/13/2017 10:54 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > > Kernel 4.11, btrfs-progs v4.7.3
> > >
> > > I run scrub and balance every night, been doing
Le 14/05/2017 à 22:15, Marc MERLIN a écrit :
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> On 05/13/2017 10:54 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>>> Kernel 4.11, btrfs-progs v4.7.3
>>>
>>> I run scrub and balance every night, been doing this for 1.5 years on this
>>> filesystem.
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 05/13/2017 10:54 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> > Kernel 4.11, btrfs-progs v4.7.3
> >
> > I run scrub and balance every night, been doing this for 1.5 years on this
> > filesystem.
>
> What are the exact commands you run every
On 05/13/2017 10:54 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> Kernel 4.11, btrfs-progs v4.7.3
>
> I run scrub and balance every night, been doing this for 1.5 years on this
> filesystem.
What are the exact commands you run every day?
> But it has just started failing:
> [...]
> saruman:~# btrfs fi usage
Marc MERLIN posted on Sat, 13 May 2017 13:54:31 -0700 as excerpted:
> Kernel 4.11, btrfs-progs v4.7.3
>
> I run scrub and balance every night, been doing this for 1.5 years on
> this filesystem.
> But it has just started failing:
> saruman:~# btrfs balance start -musage=0 /mnt/btrfs_pool1
>
Kernel 4.11, btrfs-progs v4.7.3
I run scrub and balance every night, been doing this for 1.5 years on this
filesystem.
But it has just started failing:
saruman:~# btrfs balance start -musage=0 /mnt/btrfs_pool1
Done, had to relocate 0 out of 235 chunks
saruman:~# btrfs balance start -dusage=0
13 matches
Mail list logo