Rory,
thanks for confirming. I will put together a more formal patch to the list.
Thanks,
Alex.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange
r...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
On 12/10/12, Alex Lyakas (alex.bt...@zadarastorage.com) wrote:
Hi Rory,
can you pls check if you have a file
Hi Rory,
can you pls check if you have a file /etc/mtab on your machine? If
not or if it's empty or something like, then this probably explains
the issue. In this case, pls apply patch2 that is attached (instead of
previous patches). Otherwise, pls try with patch1 (instead of
previous) and then
On 12/10/12, Alex Lyakas (alex.bt...@zadarastorage.com) wrote:
Hi Rory,
can you pls check if you have a file /etc/mtab on your machine? If
not or if it's empty or something like, then this probably explains
the issue. In this case, pls apply patch2 that is attached (instead of
previous
Hi Rory,
thanks for letting me know.
I am using the latest code from Chris's repo (
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git),
which has been updated recently (latest commit
91d9eec1ff044394f2b98ee7fcb76713dd33b994).
Do you think you can try the following patch on top of
On 11/10/12, Alex Lyakas (alex.bt...@zadarastorage.com) wrote:
I am using the latest code from Chris's repo (
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git),
which has been updated recently (latest commit
91d9eec1ff044394f2b98ee7fcb76713dd33b994).
Do you think you can
Hi Rory,
all your tests work perfectly for me (really, I swear:)), with exact
same mount points and subvol/snap/dir names.
Just to make that the patch some how did not get messed up in the
mail, I attach it.
Can you pls post the output of cat /proc/mounts and mount (if
you're willing to debug
On 11/10/12, Alex Lyakas (alex.bt...@zadarastorage.com) wrote:
Hi Rory,
all your tests work perfectly for me (really, I swear:)), with exact
same mount points and subvol/snap/dir names.
Just to make that the patch some how did not get messed up in the
mail, I attach it.
... happy to try
On 09/10/12, Alex Lyakas (alex.bt...@zadarastorage.com) wrote:
Hi Rory, Arne,
I think the problem is that currently mnt_fd in struct btrfs_receive
is used both as mount root and directory in which the
subvolume/snapshot needs to be created.
Arne, does the following patch make sense? It uses
At snapshot snap_081012_1716
It certainly seems to work if the receive target is a subvolume other
than the implicit subvolume at the root of the mount point.
So one can only btrfs receive to a subvolume, which makes sense, and is
I believe the reason one cannot 'btrfs receive to a subdirectory
if the receive target is a subvolume other
than the implicit subvolume at the root of the mount point.
So one can only btrfs receive to a subvolume, which makes sense, and is
I believe the reason one cannot 'btrfs receive to a subdirectory' as set
out in the subject of my original email
I can send snapshots to volume, but not volume/dir. Please advise
if what I am doing is incorrect.
Rory
Format usb3 disk and mount
root@orchard:/bkp# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1
WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-37-g91d9eec IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org
On 10/08/12 18:30, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I can send snapshots to volume, but not volume/dir. Please advise
if what I am doing is incorrect.
Rory
Format usb3 disk and mount
root@orchard:/bkp# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb1
WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-37-g91d9eec IS EXPERIMENTAL
12 matches
Mail list logo
