On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:33 AM, valleysmail-l...@yahoo.de
wrote:
>
>
>
> I'd like to know if there are drawbacks in using btrfs with non-ECC RAM
> instead of using ext4 with non-ECC RAM.
Non-ECC RAM can cause problems no matter what fs you use.
> I know that some features of btrfs may rely on
On 18.01.2014 00:18, Duncan wrote:
> valleysmail-l...@yahoo.de posted on Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:33:35 + as
> excerpted:
>
>> I'd like to know if there are drawbacks in using btrfs with non-ECC RAM
>> instead of using ext4 with non-ECC RAM. I know that some features of
>> btrfs may rely on ECC RAM
valleysmail-l...@yahoo.de posted on Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:33:35 + as
excerpted:
> I'd like to know if there are drawbacks in using btrfs with non-ECC RAM
> instead of using ext4 with non-ECC RAM. I know that some features of
> btrfs may rely on ECC RAM
Crossed signals somewhere, as that's enti
On 01/17/2014 01:33 PM, valleysmail-l...@yahoo.de wrote:
>
>
> I'd like to know if there are drawbacks in using btrfs with non-ECC
> RAM instead of using ext4 with non-ECC RAM. I know that some
> features of btrfs may rely on ECC RAM but is the chance of data
> corruption or even a damaged filesy
I'd like to know if there are drawbacks in using btrfs with non-ECC RAM instead
of using ext4 with non-ECC RAM. I know that some features of btrfs may rely on
ECC RAM but is the chance of data corruption or even a damaged filesystem
higher than when i use ext4 instead of btrfs?
I want to know
