On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 00:03, Pat Regan theh...@patshead.com wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:39:48 +0200
Xavier Nicollet nicol...@jeru.org wrote:
Le 26 octobre 2010 à 15:15, Pat Regan a écrit:
I turned off the 5-minute snapshots and I'm now just keeping 4
weekly, 7 daily, and 24 hourly
So, I ended up just applying the relevant commit to my existing source
tree, which did allow me to successfully remove the missing drive, so
I seem to be back up and running.
Thank you very much!
-- Erik
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct
kernel: scratch git repo from today 10.29.10 @ 14:30 PST
Btrfs v0.19-35-g1b444cd-dirty
gypsyops @ /mnt sudo btrfs filesystem show
Label: 'das4' uuid: d0e5137f-e5e7-49da-91f6-a9c4e4e72c6f
Total devices 3 FS bytes used 1.38TB
devid3 size 1.82TB used 0.00 path /dev/sdb
devid2
A friend of mine who builds storage systems designed for HPC
use has been keeping an eye on btrfs and has just done some
testing of it with 2.6.36 and seems to like what he sees in
terms of stability.
http://scalability.org/?p=2711
# But it passed our stability test. 100 iterations (3.2TB
#
These two patches give a degree of control over balance operations.
The first makes it possible to get an idea of how much work remains to
do, by tracking the number of block groups (chunks) that need to be
moved/rewritten. The second patch allows a running balance operation
to be cancelled
This patch introduces a basic form of progress monitoring for balance
operations, by counting the number of block groups remaining. The
information is exposed to userspace by an ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h |9
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |2
This patch adds an ioctl for cancelling a btrfs balance operation
mid-flight. The ioctl simply sets a flag, and the operation terminates
after the current block group move has completed.
Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h |1 +
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 25
These two patches complement the previous two kernel-side
patches. The first implements a way of displaying the current progress
of any running balance process. The second patch allows a running
balance to be cancelled.
I'm a bit uncertain about the best name for these commands. Several
Add an option to the btrfs tool to use the ioctl for cancelling
balance operations.
SIgned-off-by: Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk
---
btrfs.c |4
btrfs_cmds.c | 41 +
btrfs_cmds.h |1 +
ioctl.h |1 +
4 files changed, 47
Hi,
A friend of mine who builds storage systems designed for HPC use
has been keeping an eye on btrfs and has just done some testing
of it with 2.6.36 and seems to like what he sees in terms of
stability.
http://scalability.org/?p=2711
This is nice to see, but we should
10 matches
Mail list logo