[PATCH] explain filesystem resize devid option

2011-02-09 Thread Hubert Kario
Adds explanation to help message and man page how to use `filesystem resize' to resize only a single device not all devices of a file system. Signed-off-by: Hubert Kario ka...@wit.edu.pl --- patch to apply cleanly requires my previous patches adding advanced help functionality btrfs.c|

warning in btrfs_free_block_groups

2011-02-09 Thread Neil Schemenauer
I suspect this might be related to previous btrfs errors I've had on the same filesystem. See: http://python.ca/nas/linux/btrfs_bug.txt The most recent kernel message is: WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8239 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x218/0x275() Hardware name: MS-7388

Re: btrfs: issues with SUBVOL_SETFLAGS

2011-02-09 Thread Li Zefan
Dan Rosenberg wrote: Commit 0caa102da82799efaba88e234484786a9591c797 introduced the SUBVOL_SETFLAGS ioctl, which contains the following check: if (flags ~BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC) Oops, should be: if (flags BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ASYNC) return -EINVAL; if

Recovering data from disk with loose cable

2011-02-09 Thread Ben Gamari
We have a disk array behind two external SATA port multipliers (four disks on each multiplier) which has been running btrfs (RAID 1 for both data and metadata). Unfortunately, earlier today it seems one of the SATA cables came loose, resulting in the kernel (2.6.37) eventually OOPSing although

New btrfsck status

2011-02-09 Thread Ben Gamari
Hey all, Over the last several months there have been many claims regarding the release of the rewritten btrfsck. Unfortunately, despite numerous claims that it will be released Real Soon Now(c), I have yet to see even a repository with preliminary code. Did I miss an announcement? There is

Re: New btrfsck status

2011-02-09 Thread cwillu
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, Over the last several months there have been many claims regarding the release of the rewritten btrfsck. Unfortunately, despite numerous claims that it will be released Real Soon Now(c), I have yet to see even a

Re: mkfs.btrfs - error checking /dev/sda5 mount status

2011-02-09 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Lubos, Du meintest am 09.02.11: # cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / btrfs rw,noatime,compress,ssd 0 0 /dev/root is a symlink (which I don't like). rdev shows which real device is meant. Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line