Re: Btrfs incremental send | receive fails with Error: File not found

On 8/1/2017 10:24 PM, Cerem Cem ASLAN wrote: What is that mean? Can't we replicate the same snapshot with `btrfs send | btrfs receive` multiple times, because it will have a "Received UUID" at the first `btrfs receive You will need to make a new read-write snapshot of the received volume to

Re: btrfs issue with mariadb incremental backup

Have you checked that there is no Received UUID on the source subvolume? # btrfs sub show volume/mysql/ volume/mysql     Name:   mysql     UUID:   8a94524e-a956-c14b-bb8d-d453627f27d5     Parent UUID:    -     Received UUID:  -  

Re: btrfs issue with mariadb incremental backup

From: siranee...@tpc.co.th -- Sent: 2017-08-13 - 16:00 > Hi "A L", > > As your suggestion. Does it mean I have to make all my current subvolumes to > clear > "Receive UUID" and send them with full snapshots? You need to clear all subvolumes w

Re: btrfs issue with mariadb incremental backup

On 8/13/2017 12:52 PM, siranee...@tpc.co.th wrote: Hi "A L", [root@backuplogC7 ~]# btrfs sub show /var/lib/mariadb/mysql /var/lib/mariadb/mysql Name: mysql UUID: 92f319c5-e132-3249-9b13-d39ee77a2b44 P

Btrfs incremental send | receive fails with Error: File not found

from a Windows client. The volume 'userData' is shared by Samba. # ls -l -rw-rwx---+ 1 user user 112643654 Jul 27 17:46 '/mnt/storagePool/snapshots/userData.20170727T2102/Documents/Art & Craft/Scrapbook-Journal/FAR FAR HILL/Paper/000_29082014_w.zip' -rw-rw  1 user user  88269510 Jul 27 22:2

Re: Btrfs incremental send | receive fails with Error: File not found

ld already be in kernel-4.13_rc2 Greetings Hermann On 07/28/2017 07:26 PM, A L wrote: I often hit the following error when doing incremental btrfs send-receive: Btrfs incremental send | receive fails with Error: File not found Sometimes I can do two-three incremental snapshots, but then the

Re: Btrfs incremental send | receive fails with Error: File not found

tstrapping states "We will need to create a read-only snapshot ,,," I am using send/receive (with read-only snapshots) on a regular basis and never had a problem like yours. What are the commands you use to create your snapshots? Greetings Hermann On 07/28/2017 07:26 PM, A L wr

Re: netapp-alike snapshots?

Perhaps using a bind mount? It would look and work the same as a ordinary fs. Just need to make sure du uses one filesystem. From: Ulli Horlacher -- Sent: 2017-08-22 - 18:57 > On Tue 2017-08-22 (21:45), Roman Mamedov wrote: > >> It is beneficial to

Re: number of subvolumes

From: Ulli Horlacher -- Sent: 2017-08-23 - 09:18 > On Tue 2017-08-22 (22:48), Ulli Horlacher wrote: > >> > Assumptions that all Btrfs features such as snapshots are >> > infinitely scalable at no cost may be optimistic: >> > >> > >> >

btrfs check --clear-space-cache v1 fails if not --clear-space-cache v2 first

Seems to be some inconsistency with btrfs check --clear-space-cache v1. It only worked after clearing v2 space cache. See below result. Background. Since some time I was running with space_cache mount option. I recently changed to space_cache=v2 and used "clear_cache" mount option to clear

Re: netapp-alike snapshots?

Perhaps netapp is using a VFS overlay. There is really only one snapshot but it is shown in the overlay on every folder. Kind of the same with samba Shadow Copies. From: Ulli Horlacher -- Sent: 2017-09-09 - 21:52 > On Sat 2017-09-09 (22:43), Andrei

Re: send | receive: received snapshot is missing recent files

The problem can be that you have a Received UUID on the source volume. This breaks send-receive. From: Dave -- Sent: 2017-09-07 - 06:43 > Here is more info and a possible (shocking) explanation. This > aggregates my prior messages and it provides an almost

Re: \o/ compsize

On 9/4/2017 5:11 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: Hi! Here's an utility to measure used compression type + ratio on a set of files or directories: https://github.com/kilobyte/compsize Great tool. Just tried it on some of my backup snapshots.    # compsize portage.20170904T2200    142432 files.    all 

Re: Is autodefrag recommended?

There is a drawback in that defragmentation re-dups data that is previously deduped or shared in snapshots/subvolumes. From: Marat Khalili -- Sent: 2017-09-04 - 11:31 > Hello list, > good time of the day, > > More than once I see mentioned in this list that autodefrag

btrfs defrag kernel 3.11

] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [17838.564277] [81735a2c] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [17838.564279] [81088f20] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [17838.564281] ---[ end trace b632fc27406d3441 ]--- Is there some problem? Regards, Marco L. Crociani -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

parent transid troubles

Hello list- Under heavy load (i/o), one of our fileservers lost two drives in a raid6 configuration. After the drives were synchronized, we can no longer mount the multiple-device btrfs filesystem due to (at least) parent transid verification. btrfsck built from git commit

Re: parent transid troubles

Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com writes: Excerpts from Gregory L Shomo's message of 2011-04-19 15:08:13 -0400: Hello list- Under heavy load (i/o), one of our fileservers lost two drives in a raid6 configuration. After the drives were synchronized, we can no longer mount the multiple

Re: parent transid troubles

Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com writes: Excerpts from Gregory L Shomo's message of 2011-04-20 08:56:02 -0400: Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com writes: Excerpts from Gregory L Shomo's message of 2011-04-19 15:08:13 -0400: Hello list- Under heavy load (i/o), one of our fileservers

Re: parent transid troubles

Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com writes: Excerpts from Gregory L Shomo's message of 2011-04-20 09:20:20 -0400: Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com writes: Excerpts from Gregory L Shomo's message of 2011-04-20 08:56:02 -0400: Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com writes: Excerpts from

Re: parent transid troubles

Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com writes: Mounting the filesystem read-only from /dev/sdd1 fails, but succeeds from /dev/sdc1... after about 4855 parent transid verification failures. kernel: [ 293.827069] Btrfs loaded kernel: [ 293.828014] device fsid

Re: parent transid troubles

Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com writes: OK, we've re-compiled linux-2.6.38 patched up to btrfs-unstable commit f65647c29b14f5a32ff6f3237b0ef3b375ed5a79 and can now mount the filesystem. Mounting the filesystem read-only from /dev/sdd1 fails, but succeeds from /dev/sdc1... after about

How to handle badblocks with btrfs?

[ 8073.244629] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 494581666 [ 8073.244667] ata1: EH complete [ 8073.305813] btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook: 155 callbacks suppressed [ 8073.305823] btrfs csum failed ino 13966 off 235696128 csum 2566472073 private 501345114 # smartctl -d ata -l selftest /dev/sda smartctl 5.40

Visiting Nurses RN's marketing email list

We have many other lists as well and this week they are on sale. Just email me here: willie.lamb...@inspiresuccess.in To invoke no further correspondence status please send an email to disapp...@inspiresuccess.in -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs

RE: Hey, Opt In Email Lists Give Away!

but now you have the chance to grab a massive list. Use it for ezine, email, autoresponders, they will bring your website a huge amount of power, traffic and sales. You have to check it out at http://www.traffictractor.com All the best, Sam L. Carl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Sorry! I made an error in my last email!

://tiny.cc/ndonh 2) Auto Traffic Avalanche - http://tiny.cc/3wsuq 3) Auto Blog System - http://tiny.cc/ytf7r 4) Zero Cost Commissions - http://tiny.cc/ermdw 5) CPA Instruments - http://tiny.cc/ruh9b All the best, Sam L. Carl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs

Can't resize second device in RAID1

Hi, the situation: Label: 'RootFS'  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB. I

Re: Can't resize second device in RAID1

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:12:06AM +0100, Marco L. Crociani wrote: Hi, the situation: Label: 'RootFS'  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB

Re: Can't resize second device in RAID1

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Sander san...@humilis.net wrote: Marco L. Crociani wrote (ao): On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:12:06AM +0100, Marco L. Crociani wrote: # ./btrfs fi sh Label: 'RootFS'?? uuid: c87975a0-a575

Re: Errors in rebalancing RAID1 array after disk failure.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:46 PM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:39:12PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote: Apr 14 18:07:52 evo kernel: [  431.054709] btrfs: relocating block group 1401002393600 flags 17 Apr 14 18:08:14 evo kernel: [  453.506541] btrfs csum failed ino

Re: Errors in rebalancing RAID1 array after disk failure.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Marco L. Crociani marco.croci...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:46 PM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:39:12PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote: Apr 14 18:07:52 evo kernel: [  431.054709] btrfs: relocating block group

Re: Errors in rebalancing RAID1 array after disk failure.

Today I tried scrub... Apr 19 17:36:01 evo kernel: [ 187.932297] device label RootFS devid 1 transid 47046 /dev/sda3 Apr 19 17:36:02 evo kernel: [ 188.145858] device label RootFS devid 3 transid 47046 /dev/sdb3 Apr 19 17:36:19 evo kernel: [ 205.483044] device label RootFS devid 1 transid 47046

Re: Errors in rebalancing RAID1 array after disk failure.

Hi all, today another episode... I have compiled and tried kernel 3.4-rc5 ./btrfs fi sh Label: 'RootFS' uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96 Total devices 3 FS bytes used 1006.67GB devid3 size 1.75TB used 357.00GB path /dev/sdb3 devid1 size 1.75TB used

Re: Errors in rebalancing RAID1 array after disk failure.

On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:54 PM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:42:05PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote: Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [  347.661915] Call Trace: Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [  347.661964]  [a00b76ac] btrfs_ioctl_dev_info+0x15c/0x1a0

Re: Errors in rebalancing RAID1 array after disk failure.

, May 2, 2012 at 5:27 PM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 05:42:05PM +0200, Marco L. Crociani wrote: Apr 19 17:38:41 evo kernel: [  347.661964]  [a00b76ac] btrfs_ioctl_dev_info+0x15c/0x1a0

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix crash in scrub repair code when device is missing

-by: Marco L. Crociani marco.croci...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens sbehr...@giantdisaster.de ---  fs/btrfs/scrub.c |    7 +++  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index b679bf6..7e487be 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs

drawbacks of non-ECC RAM

I'd like to know if there are drawbacks in using btrfs with non-ECC RAM instead of using ext4 with non-ECC RAM. I know that some features of btrfs may rely on ECC RAM but is the chance of data corruption or even a damaged filesystem higher than when i use ext4 instead of btrfs? I want to know

Uzenetet!

Hello. Jo estet, es hogyan csinalod? Csak egy gyors, van egy hivatalos lehetoseget szeretnek beszelni veled negyszemkozt.   Orulnek a gyors valaszt itt az en szemelyes magan e-mail címet a tovabbi kommunikaciot. Udvozlettel, Mrs. Ko majus Leung e-mail: komayln...@gmail.com

uncorrectable error, but no file there

Hi, I ran a btrfs scrub & found 3 uncorrectable errors: [ 5461.412007] BTRFS warning (device md126p2): checksum error at logical 193296359424 on dev /dev/md126p2, sector 379645488, root 257, inode 1795724, offset 217088, length 4096, links 1 (path:

Re: btrfs-progs-4.13: cmds-inspect-tree-stats.h: No such file or directory

On 11/22/2017 11:15 PM, John L. Center wrote: On 09/09/2017 01:48 AM, Uli Heller wrote: I dowloaded the btrfs-progs-v4.13.tar.xz tarball and tried to build it. Unfortunately, I get an error about cmds-inspect-tree-stats.h. The file seems to be missing from the tarball, it used to exist

Re: btrfs-progs-4.13: cmds-inspect-tree-stats.h: No such file or directory

ats.h" ^ $ LANG=C ls -l btrfs-progs-v4.12/cmds-inspect-tree-stats.h btrfs-progs-v4.13/cmds-inspect-tree-stats.h ls: cannot access btrfs-progs-v4.13/cmds-inspect-tree-stats.h: No such file or directory -rw-rw-r-- 1 uli uli 905 Jul 28 15:29 btrfs-progs-v4.12/cmds-in

I messed up disk replace of RAID5

Hi, I have a copy of this data online and a backup offline but I would like to find out if we can recover this. A drive broke and I made a mess while replacing it. each of sda,sdb,sdc,sdd is a 2 disk hardware RAID0. one disk of sda died and. I replaced it. Made a new raid0 array: sde This was my