Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix a typo

2021-03-26 Thread Bhaskar Chowdhury
On 14:47 Fri 26 Mar 2021, David Sterba wrote: On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:29:32AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: s/reponsible/responsible/ So this is exactly what I don't want to see happen - one patch per typo. I tried to explain it in the previous patch, please either fix all typos under fs

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix a typo

2021-03-26 Thread David Sterba
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:29:32AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > > s/reponsible/responsible/ So this is exactly what I don't want to see happen - one patch per typo. I tried to explain it in the previous patch, please either fix all typos under fs/btrfs or don't bother.

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix a typo

2021-03-25 Thread Damien Le Moal
On 2021/03/26 10:02, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote: > > s/reponsible/responsible/ > > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury > --- > fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c > index 3d9088eab2fc..14de898967bf 100644 > ---

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix a typo in comment of btrfs_balance

2018-07-04 Thread David Sterba
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 04:16:29PM +0800, Su Yue wrote: > The typo 'mutexe' should be 'mutex'. > > Signed-off-by: Su Yue > --- > fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c > index e034ad9e23b4..d9d87deb1160