Re: Add udev-md-raid-safe-timeouts.rules

2018-04-17 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2018-04-16 13:10, Chris Murphy wrote: Adding linux-usb@ and linux-scsi@ (This email does contain the thread initiating email, but some replies are on the other lists.) On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: On 2018-04-15 21:04, Chris Murphy wrote: I just ran into thi

Re: Add udev-md-raid-safe-timeouts.rules

2018-04-17 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2018-04-16 11:02, Wol's lists wrote: On 16/04/18 12:43, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: On 2018-04-15 21:04, Chris Murphy wrote: I just ran into this: https://github.com/neilbrown/mdadm/pull/32/commits/af1ddca7d5311dfc9ed60a5eb6497db1296f1bec This solution is inadequate, can it be made more

Re: Add udev-md-raid-safe-timeouts.rules

2018-04-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018, Chris Murphy wrote: > Adding linux-usb@ and linux-scsi@ > (This email does contain the thread initiating email, but some replies > are on the other lists.) > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn > wrote: > > On 2018-04-15 21:04, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> >

Re: Add udev-md-raid-safe-timeouts.rules

2018-04-16 Thread Chris Murphy
Adding linux-usb@ and linux-scsi@ (This email does contain the thread initiating email, but some replies are on the other lists.) On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 5:43 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: > On 2018-04-15 21:04, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> I just ran into this: >> >> https://github.com/neilbrown/

Re: Add udev-md-raid-safe-timeouts.rules

2018-04-16 Thread Wol's lists
On 16/04/18 12:43, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote: On 2018-04-15 21:04, Chris Murphy wrote: I just ran into this: https://github.com/neilbrown/mdadm/pull/32/commits/af1ddca7d5311dfc9ed60a5eb6497db1296f1bec This solution is inadequate, can it be made more generic? This isn't an md specific proble

Re: Add udev-md-raid-safe-timeouts.rules

2018-04-16 Thread Roger Heflin
And then there are SAN devices managed by multipath, were the timeouts should maybe even lower. I know in the scsi layer there are some extra retries going on and that that actual timeout hits at 5x the base timeout. So there kind of is a soft timeout on SAN devices at the base timeout.Though

Re: Add udev-md-raid-safe-timeouts.rules

2018-04-16 Thread Austin S. Hemmelgarn
On 2018-04-15 21:04, Chris Murphy wrote: I just ran into this: https://github.com/neilbrown/mdadm/pull/32/commits/af1ddca7d5311dfc9ed60a5eb6497db1296f1bec This solution is inadequate, can it be made more generic? This isn't an md specific problem, it affects Btrfs and LVM as well. And in fact ra