On 2015-12-02 18:40, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 12/03/2015 06:48 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 12/2/15 11:48 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On a side note, do either XFS or ext4 support removing the norecovery
option from the mount flags through mount -o remount? Even if they
don't, that might be a
On 2015-12-02 18:51, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:40:08AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 12/03/2015 06:48 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 12/2/15 11:48 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On a side note, do either XFS or ext4 support removing the norecovery
option from the mount flags
On 12/2/15 3:23 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/12/02 17:06 +0800:
>>
>>
>> Russell Coker wrote on 2015/12/02 17:25 +1100:
>>> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:05:09 AM Eric Sandeen wrote:
yes, xfs does; we have "-o norecovery" if you don't want that, or need
to mount a
On 2015-12-02 11:54, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 12/2/15 3:23 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/12/02 17:06 +0800:
Russell Coker wrote on 2015/12/02 17:25 +1100:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:05:09 AM Eric Sandeen wrote:
yes, xfs does; we have "-o norecovery" if you don't want that, or
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:48:39PM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-12-02 11:54, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >On 12/2/15 3:23 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >>Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/12/02 17:06 +0800:
> >>>Russell Coker wrote on 2015/12/02 17:25 +1100:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:05:09 AM Eric
Russell Coker wrote on 2015/12/02 17:25 +1100:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:05:09 AM Eric Sandeen wrote:
yes, xfs does; we have "-o norecovery" if you don't want that, or need
to mount a filesystem with a dirty log on a readonly device.
That option also works with Ext3/4 so it seems to be a
Qu Wenruo wrote on 2015/12/02 17:06 +0800:
Russell Coker wrote on 2015/12/02 17:25 +1100:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 06:05:09 AM Eric Sandeen wrote:
yes, xfs does; we have "-o norecovery" if you don't want that, or need
to mount a filesystem with a dirty log on a readonly device.
That option
On 12/2/15 11:48 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On a side note, do either XFS or ext4 support removing the norecovery
> option from the mount flags through mount -o remount? Even if they
> don't, that might be a nice feature to have in BTRFS if we can safely
> support it.
It's not remountable
Hugo Mills posted on Wed, 02 Dec 2015 23:51:55 + as excerpted:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:40:08AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>> Not remountable is very good to implement it.
>> Makes things super easy to do.
>>
>> Or we will need to add log replay for remount time.
>>
>> I'd like to
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:40:08AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 12/03/2015 06:48 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >On 12/2/15 11:48 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> >
> >>On a side note, do either XFS or ext4 support removing the norecovery
> >>option from the mount flags through mount -o remount?
On 12/03/2015 06:48 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 12/2/15 11:48 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On a side note, do either XFS or ext4 support removing the norecovery
option from the mount flags through mount -o remount? Even if they
don't, that might be a nice feature to have in BTRFS if we can
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:46:32PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> Chris Mason wrote on 2015/11/30 11:48 -0500:
> >On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:46:34PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >>We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
> >>main problem is that they've got a corrupt
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:06:00PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:48:01AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:46:34PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > >We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
> > > main problem is that they've
On 12/1/15 1:00 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:06:00PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:48:01AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:46:34PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:48:01AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:46:34PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
> > main problem is that they've got a corrupt log tree. That isn't the
> > subject of this email,
On 2015-11-30 11:48, Chris Mason wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:46:34PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
main problem is that they've got a corrupt log tree. That isn't the
subject of this email, though.
The issue I'd like
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:46:34PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
>We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
> main problem is that they've got a corrupt log tree. That isn't the
> subject of this email, though.
>
>The issue I'd like to raise is that even with -oro as
On 2015-11-30 10:28, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:59:40AM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2015-11-28 08:46, Hugo Mills wrote:
We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
main problem is that they've got a corrupt log tree. That isn't the
subject
On 2015-11-28 08:46, Hugo Mills wrote:
We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
main problem is that they've got a corrupt log tree. That isn't the
subject of this email, though.
The issue I'd like to raise is that even with -oro as a point
option, the FS is
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:59:40AM -0500, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2015-11-28 08:46, Hugo Mills wrote:
> >We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
> >main problem is that they've got a corrupt log tree. That isn't the
> >subject of this email, though.
> >
> >
Chris Mason wrote on 2015/11/30 11:48 -0500:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:46:34PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
We've just had someone on IRC with a problem mounting their FS. The
main problem is that they've got a corrupt log tree. That isn't the
subject of this email, though.
The issue
21 matches
Mail list logo
