dima wrote (ao):
Maybe just skip partitioning altogether ;)
+1
format the device to
btrfs and use subvolumes instead of your usual partitions (some
/boot restrictions apply). You won't be able to use grub2 though,
but syslinux will work.
Grub2 has btrfs support for quite some time now,
On 12/15/2011 05:25 PM, Sander wrote:
dima wrote (ao):
Maybe just skip partitioning altogether ;)
+1
format the device to
btrfs and use subvolumes instead of your usual partitions (some
/boot restrictions apply). You won't be able to use grub2 though,
but syslinux will work.
Grub2 has
dima wrote (ao):
format the device to
btrfs and use subvolumes instead of your usual partitions (some
/boot restrictions apply). You won't be able to use grub2 though,
but syslinux will work.
Grub2 has btrfs support for quite some time now, which you are aware of
I assume. Grub2 can't cope
Hallo, Wilfred,
Du meintest am 14.12.11:
What is best practice when partitioning a device that holds one or
more btr-filesystems
That depends ...
My favourite installation is a bundle of 2-TByte-disks which btrfs
presents as one big disk. data=raid0, metadata=raid1
It's a kind of archive,
2011/12/14 Wilfred van Velzen wvvel...@gmail.com:
Hi,
What is best practice when partitioning a device that holds one or
more btr-filesystems
Do it the old fashioned way, and create a number of partitions
according to your needs? Or create one big btrfs partition and use
subvolumes where
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Wilfred van Velzen wvvel...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is best practice when partitioning a device that holds one or
more btr-filesystems
When it comes to best practices in btrfs
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Gareth Pye gar...@cerberos.id.au wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Wilfred van Velzen wvvel...@gmail.com
wrote:
(I'm not interested in what early adopter users do when they are using
rc kernels...)
Yet your going to use a FS without a working fsck?
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Wilfred van Velzen wvvel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Gareth Pye gar...@cerberos.id.au wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Wilfred van Velzen wvvel...@gmail.com
wrote:
(I'm not interested in what early adopter users do when they are
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Wilfred van Velzen wvvel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Gareth Pye gar...@cerberos.id.au wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Wilfred van Velzen wvvel...@gmail.com
wrote:
(I'm not interested in what early adopter users do when they are
On 12/15/2011 03:51 AM, Wilfred van Velzen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Wilfred van Velzenwvvel...@gmail.com wrote:
What is best practice when partitioning a device that holds one or
more
10 matches
Mail list logo