Hey.
On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 20:38 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> I have a prototype code for that and after the years, seeing the
> request
> again, I'm not against adding it as long as it's not advertised as a
> security feature.
I'd expect that anyone in the security area should know that
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 03:55:25AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Just wondered... was it ever planned (or is there some equivalent) to
> get support for btrfs in zerofree?
The zerofree was requested, eg. here
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69121
and there was a
On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 23:31 +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> QCOW2 would add a second layer of COW
> on top of
> Btrfs, which sounds like a nightmare.
I've just seen there is even a nocow option "specifically" for btrfs...
it seems however that it doesn't disable the CoW of qcow, but rather
that of
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 16:50:22 +0100
Adam Borowski wrote:
> Since we're on a btrfs mailing list, if you use qemu, you really want
> sparse format:raw instead of qcow2 or preallocated raw. This also works
> great with TRIM.
Agreed, that's why I use RAW. QCOW2 would add a
On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 16:50 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Since we're on a btrfs mailing list
Well... my original question was whether someone could make zerofree
support for btrfs (which I think would be best if someone who knows how
btrfs really works)... thus I directed the question to this
On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 19:37 +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Note you can use it on HDDs too, even without QEMU and the like: via
> using LVM
> "thin" volumes. I use that on a number of machines, the benefit is
> that since
> TRIMed areas are "stored nowhere", those partitions allow for
> incredibly
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 07:37:22PM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> Note you can use it on HDDs too, even without QEMU and the like: via using LVM
> "thin" volumes. I use that on a number of machines, the benefit is that since
> TRIMed areas are "stored nowhere", those partitions allow for incredibly
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 15:19:05 +0100
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> TRIM/discard... not sure how far this is really a solution.
It is the solution in a great many of usage scenarios, don't know enough about
your particular one, though.
Note you can use it on HDDs too,
On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 09:16 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Do you want zerofree for thin storage optimization, or for security?
I don't think one can really use it for security (neither on SSD or
HDD).
On both, zeroed blocks may still be readable by forensic measures.
So optimisation, i.e. digging
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 03:55:25AM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Just wondered... was it ever planned (or is there some equivalent) to
> get support for btrfs in zerofree?
Do you want zerofree for thin storage optimization, or for security?
For the former, you can use fstrim; this is
10 matches
Mail list logo