Can someone verify if it is a bug?
Thanks
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Ronen Shitrit rshit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
According to the GCM NIST publication, the counter increment should be
module 32 bit.
Looking into the crypto code, I can see that when using gcm(aes) the
gcm will use
Hi
According to the GCM NIST publication, the counter increment should be
module 32 bit.
Looking into the crypto code, I can see that when using gcm(aes) the
gcm will use the ctr over aes,
ctr.c is using the crypto_inc with size of blocksize, which is 16 for AES.
in case crypto_inc will overflow
. This does not alter my key at all. Point 1 on
the next side is referring to the AesKeyRdMode bit which must be set
prior reading the key. I can't find a definition of this bit so I guess
the spec is out of date here.
[Ronen Shitrit] you are right, this should be fix accordingly:
To decrypt a data
run the
encryption and authentication as one operation?
BTW: will the kernel IPsec patch that uses this AEAD API will be
submitted on this mailing list as well?
Thanks
Ronen Shitrit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-crypto-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Hi Herbert
I found a mailing thread discussing combined mode algorithms, I think
that this is the main missing link for good async support.
Are you planning that this combined alg mode will support the async API?
Is there any progress on this direction?
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
-Original
Wow, I thought that there was more progress ...
BTW:
I know that the OCF support the OpenSWAN, does it also support the KLIPS
by now?
I also noticed that the Acrypto have a patch to support KLIPS, does it
also support the OpenSWAN?
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
-Original Message-
From
development of the async crypto
support?
Thanks for your advice
Ronen Shitrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
should be applied after the OCF patch for OpenSwan,
it includes:
Add support for tasklet,
Fix for using OpenSwan in AH mode
Fix for using the OCF with OpenSwan in AH mode.
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
-
Hi
I'm using the OpenSwan KLIPS
Hi
I tested it and it seems fine now.
Before I got same digest for MD5 and HMAC MD5.
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
-Original Message-
From: David McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:31 PM
To: Ronen Shitrit
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OCF
be
fix in the OCF release.
Now I still get hang when multi is bigger then 2, I can see that part of
the threads didn't finish?!
Any suggestions??
Ronen Shitrit
Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
of the buffers from user to kernel space each time. Any
other suggestions??
Is it possible that we will skip the copy to kernel, and use direct
mode??
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-crypto in
the body
moved to the read callback.
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Evgeniy Polyakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:36 AM
To: Ronen Shitrit
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dm-crypt
, then I will need to re-evaluate my decision for
going with
the OCF, since the big guys here likes to go with the mainline.
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 5:39 AM
seems better.
But If I let the limit to get to more then 100 pending requests, then I
get memory corruption probably cause of some overrun.
I'm not sure if any pending requests is allowed at all, I will need to
investigate it more.
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd
reading through the dm_crypt.
-I think that we might have a problem if a write operation will be
processed in parallel to a read operation,
the read might wait for the write to complete, and the dm_async_pending
might also get wrong values???
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd
it is queued and we return to the user,
before the encrypt is completed.
Regards
Ronen Shitrit
Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd
-Original Message-
From: Evgeniy Polyakov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 10:50 PM
To: Ronen Shitrit
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux
16 matches
Mail list logo