On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 04:16:10PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> This patch fixes the xfrm_user code to use the actual array size
> rather than the hard-coded CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME length. This is
> because the array size is fixed at 64 bytes while we want to increase
> the in-kernel
On 06/04/17 10:16, Herbert Xu wrote:
> This patch fixes the xfrm_user code to use the actual array size
> rather than the hard-coded CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME length. This is
> because the array size is fixed at 64 bytes while we want to increase
> the in-kernel CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME value.
>
>
This patch fixes the xfrm_user code to use the actual array size
rather than the hard-coded CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME length. This is
because the array size is fixed at 64 bytes while we want to increase
the in-kernel CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME value.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu