Re: PRAMFS with XIP support

2008-10-08 Thread Marco Stornelli
Hi Mike, I am not the PRAMFS mantainer, and I think he is in charge to do that (right?), I sent an email to Steve Longerbeam and to MontaVista support, but I haven't received any response. However, if you think it could be useful to submit it to lkml I could do it. Regards. Mike Frysinger ha

[RFC 2/6] [PWM] Changes to existing include/linux/pwm.h to adapt to generic PWM API

2008-10-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Signed-off-by: Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/pwm.h | 168 -- 1 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h index 3945f80..d3d18f7 100644 --- a/include/linux/pwm.h +++

[RFC 5/6] [PWM] Install new Atmel PWMC driver in Kconfig, expunge old one

2008-10-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Signed-off-by: Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/arm/Kconfig |2 + drivers/Makefile |2 + drivers/misc/Kconfig |9 - drivers/misc/Makefile|1 - drivers/misc/atmel_pwm.c | 409 -- drivers/pwm/Kconfig |

[RFC 1/6] [PWM] Generic PWM API implementation

2008-10-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Signed-off-by: Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/pwm/pwm.c | 667 + 1 files changed, 667 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm.c diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm.c new file mode 100644

[RFC 4/6] [PWM] Driver for Atmel PWMC peripheral

2008-10-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Signed-off-by: Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/pwm/atmel-pwm.c | 631 +++ 1 files changed, 631 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/atmel-pwm.c diff --git a/drivers/pwm/atmel-pwm.c b/drivers/pwm/atmel-pwm.c new

Re: PRAMFS with XIP support

2008-10-08 Thread Tim Bird
Marco Stornelli wrote: Hi Mike, I am not the PRAMFS mantainer, and I think he is in charge to do that (right?), I sent an email to Steve Longerbeam and to MontaVista support, but I haven't received any response. However, if you think it could be useful to submit it to lkml I could do it.

Re: PRAMFS with XIP support

2008-10-08 Thread Daniel Walker
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:25 -0700, Tim Bird wrote: Marco Stornelli wrote: Hi Mike, I am not the PRAMFS mantainer, and I think he is in charge to do that (right?), I sent an email to Steve Longerbeam and to MontaVista support, but I haven't received any response. However, if you think

Re: RFC - size tool for kernel build system

2008-10-08 Thread Chris Snook
Tim Bird wrote: I've been thinking about a tool that might be useful to track kernel size changes. I'm posting this Request For Comments to get feedback, and determine if this is something that would be worthwhile to pursue. What I envision is some new kernel build targets, specifically

Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

2008-10-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:43, Bill Gatliff wrote: This series proposes a generic PWM driver API. seems that the API is solely geared to handle PWM as an output signal. what about input ? all the utility config functions lack set in their name. it's a little confusing as to whether the

Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

2008-10-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:43, Bill Gatliff wrote: This series proposes a generic PWM driver API. seems that the API is solely geared to handle PWM as an output signal. True. The peripherals I'm currently targeting are output-only devices, and the API reflects that.

Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

2008-10-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Bill Gatliff wrote: all the utility config functions lack set in their name. it's a little confusing as to whether the function is a get or set at first glance. For the record, I can support adding a set to the function names. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe

Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

2008-10-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 22:23, Bill Gatliff wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:43, Bill Gatliff wrote: This series proposes a generic PWM driver API. seems that the API is solely geared to handle PWM as an output signal. True. The peripherals I'm currently targeting are

Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

2008-10-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Mike Frysinger wrote: the Blackfin timers/pwm's can flip between input and ouput based on the configuration register. everything else (pin/etc...) is unchanged. Interesting! Are you proposing that the API accommodate both input and output devices? i dont think we should preclude it

Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

2008-10-08 Thread Bill Gatliff
Mike Frysinger wrote: if you'd seriously play with a Blackfin board, i think we can arrange that I'd seriously *love* to play with one, but I'm pretty strapped for time for another couple of months. The only purpose it would serve near-term would be to prove out the input capabilities of a

Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

2008-10-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 23:46, Bill Gatliff wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Are you proposing that the API accommodate both input and output devices? i dont think we should preclude it from the outset. I don't think have a problem with that. At some point, I would need someone with

Re: [RFC 0/6] Proposal for a Generic PWM Device API

2008-10-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 00:18, Bill Gatliff wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: if you'd seriously play with a Blackfin board, i think we can arrange that I'd seriously *love* to play with one, but I'm pretty strapped for time for another couple of months. The only purpose it would serve near-term

Re: [RFC 5/6] [PWM] Install new Atmel PWMC driver in Kconfig, expunge old one

2008-10-08 Thread Hans-Christian Egtvedt
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:43:17 -0500 Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snipp diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig index a726f3b..cdea0bb 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig @@ -13,15 +13,6 @@ menuconfig MISC_DEVICES if MISC_DEVICES