Re: [PATCH] bootup: Add built-in kernel command line for x86

2008-08-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Tim Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add support for a built-in command line for x86 architectures. The Kconfig help gives the major rationale for this addition. i have actually used a local hack quite similar to this to inject boot options into bzImages via randconfig - so i would find this

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [x86] Configuration options to compile out x86 CPU support code

2008-08-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch adds some configuration options that allow to compile out CPU vendor-specific code in x86 kernels (in arch/x86/kernel/cpu). The new configuration options are only visible when CONFIG_EMBEDDED is selected, as they are mostly

Re: [PATCH 1/1] [x86] Configuration options to compile out x86 CPU support code

2008-08-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
-tip testing found a couple of build failures: LD .tmp_vmlinux1 arch/x86/lib/lib.a(usercopy_32.o): In function `__copy_to_user_ll': (.text+0x11e): undefined reference to `movsl_mask' arch/x86/lib/lib.a(usercopy_32.o): In function `__copy_from_user_ll': (.text+0x1fa): undefined reference

Re: [PATCH] [x86] Move cmpxchg fallbacks to a generic place

2008-08-18 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c defines a few fallback functions (cmpxchg_*()) that are used when the CPU doesn't support cmpxchg and/or cmpxchg64 natively. However, while defined in an Intel-specific file, these functions are also used for CPUs from

Re: Wait for console to become available, v3.2

2009-04-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* David VomLehn dvoml...@cisco.com wrote: Parallelization to improve boot times has been successful enough that race conditions now exist between the init_post() open of /dev/console and initialization of the console device. When this occurs, opening /dev/console fails and any

Re: Wait for console to become available, v3.2

2009-04-21 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Arjan van de Ven ar...@infradead.org wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:43:46 +0200 Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote: The proper approach would be to use one of the async_synchronize*() facilities in kernel/async.c to properly order the opening of the console with device init

Re: [PATCH] PM: Hide CONFIG_PM from users

2011-02-07 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: It is very rare to find a current system which is both sufficiently resource constrained to want to compile out power management support and sufficiently power insensitive to be able to tolerate doing so. Since having the configuration

Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power management all the time

2011-02-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
| 29 +++-- 16 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) Ok, there's some real bang for bucks in this patch, nice! It's a beginning. Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu Also, i've Cc:-ed Linus, to check whether the idea to make power management

Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power management all the time

2011-02-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Tim Bird tbird...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote: Rafael, could you do a defconfig-ish x86 build with and without CONFIG_PM, and post the 'size vmlinux' comparison - so that we can see the size difference? We make some things