On 2023/10/31 14:05, Gao Xiang wrote:
As Linus pointed out [1], lockref_put_return() is fundamentally
designed to be something that can fail. It behaves as a fastpath-only
thing, and the failure case needs to be handled anyway.
Actually, since the new pcluster was just allocated without being
On 2023/10/31 14:20, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 20:08, Gao Xiang wrote:
As Linus pointed out [1], lockref_put_return() is fundamentally
designed to be something that can fail. It behaves as a fastpath-only
thing, and the failure case needs to be handled anyway.
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 20:08, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
> As Linus pointed out [1], lockref_put_return() is fundamentally
> designed to be something that can fail. It behaves as a fastpath-only
> thing, and the failure case needs to be handled anyway.
>
> Actually, since the new pcluster was just
As Linus pointed out [1], lockref_put_return() is fundamentally
designed to be something that can fail. It behaves as a fastpath-only
thing, and the failure case needs to be handled anyway.
Actually, since the new pcluster was just allocated without being
populated, it won't be accessed by
