Hi Jaegeuk,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 01/11] f2fs: add
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 02/11] f2fs: punch the core
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 03/11] f2fs: add infra for ino
Hi,
One comment as following.
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 05/11] f2fs: add info of appended
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 06/11] f2fs: skip
Hi Changman,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:41:11AM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:47:21PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
This patch enforces in-place-updates only when fdatasync is requested.
If we adopt this in-place-updates for the fdatasync, we can skip to
Hi Chao,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:28:16PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
Got it.
Fixed that.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:32:08PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi,
One comment as following.
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
Hi Chao,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:41:35PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
Change log from v1:
o adjust need_writecp condition, pointed by Chao
From 387830bd09845dce83bf277bf8416c986c108eb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim jaeg...@kernel.org
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:47:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid retrying wrong recovery routine when error was
Hi Dongho,
At first, please write a patch under the correct rule.
(e.g., description)
About this change, it's negative.
When considering SSR, we need to take care of the following scenario.
- old segno : X
- new address : Z
- old curseg : Y
This means, a new block is supposed to be written to Z
Специальное предложение
Вы дополнительно получаете 20 000 рублей за 2 перевозки из Европы
Что для этого нужно? - если Вы можете планировать свои отгрузки, давая
предварительную заявку за пять рабочих дней, для Вас действует система
накопительной скидки, форма возврата любая -
This patch adds a tracepoint for f2fs_issue_flush.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim jaeg...@kernel.org
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 +++
include/trace/events/f2fs.h | 24
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:22:15AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi Changman,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:41:11AM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:47:21PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
This patch enforces in-place-updates only when fdatasync is requested.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:24:48AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi Dongho,
At first, please write a patch under the correct rule.
(e.g., description)
About this change, it's negative.
When considering SSR, we need to take care of the following scenario.
- old segno : X
- new address : Z
-
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:55AM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:22:15AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi Changman,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:41:11AM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:47:21PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
This
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:24:50AM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:24:48AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi Dongho,
At first, please write a patch under the correct rule.
(e.g., description)
About this change, it's negative.
When considering SSR, we need to take
Hi Jaegeuk Changman,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:08 AM
To: Changman Lee
Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:56:31AM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:08:21PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 08:54:55AM +0900, Changman Lee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 05:22:15AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Hi Changman,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:45:38AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk Changman,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 9:08 AM
To: Changman Lee
Cc: linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:44:43AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
-Original Message-
From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 6:47 AM
To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi. There was an unnecessary line in function, allocate_data_block.
In this function, we already choosed old curseg(Y) and then we always allocate
new address(∈Y) from it.
After that we call refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr).
In that function, we call located_dirty_segment with
23 matches
Mail list logo
