https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
kelak (ale...@gmx.net) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ale...@gmx.net
--- Comment #175
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #176 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
After several months the bug occurred again with kernel 6.5 rc4.
After rebooting with REISUB, I tried forcing GC with the usual script and it
gave me no problems.
--
You may reply to this
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #177 from Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) ---
(In reply to kelak from comment #175)
> Still happens on my system with 6.4.x kernels after about 4 days (today the
> second time in the last two weeks):
Jaegeuk has proposed a workaround soluti
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #178 from kelak (ale...@gmx.net) ---
>Jaegeuk has proposed a workaround solution as below, it aims to enable from
>6.6-rc1, could you please have a try with it?
>
>https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #179 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to kelak from comment #178)
> >Jaegeuk has proposed a workaround solution as below, it aims to enable from
> >6.6-rc1, could you please have a try with it?
> >
>
> >https://git.ker
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #180 from kelak (ale...@gmx.net) ---
(In reply to Guido from comment #179)
> (In reply to kelak from comment #178)
> > >Jaegeuk has proposed a workaround solution as below, it aims to enable
> from
> > >6.6-rc1, could you please have a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #181 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
The fact that dirty segments don't go below 1 suggests that the bug is not
completely fixed even with this patch. This is unfortunate because the 5.15
kernel, which is not affected by th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210797
Tomas Thiemel (thie...@centrum.cz) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Res
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210795
Tomas Thiemel (thie...@centrum.cz) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Res
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218096
Bug ID: 218096
Summary: first 4K all zeros when release_cblocks set,
reserve_cblocks restores access
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: Lin
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218349
Bug ID: 218349
Summary: f2fs partitions corrupted during power failures and
cannot be fixed with fsck.
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Hardware: AMD
OS: L
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218349
Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218471
Bug ID: 218471
Summary: F2FS fails to mount rw at boot with "invalid zstd
compress level: 6"
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218471
--- Comment #1 from Dhya Pacifica (d...@picorealm.net) ---
The changelog for the Debian linux-image-6.1.0-18-amd64 kernel package lists:
- f2fs: clean up i_compress_flag and i_compress_level usage
- f2fs: convert to use bitmap API
- f
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218471
Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version||6.1.76
Regres
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218471
--- Comment #2 from Salvatore Bonaccorso (car...@debian.org) ---
regressions list report:
https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/zcu3vcrt9vopu...@eldamar.lan/T/#u
Debian downstream bugreport: https://bugs.debian.org/1063422
--
You may reply to thi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218471
Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jaeg...@kernel.org
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218471
Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@kernel.org
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218349
Kane Ch'in (qinfd2...@lzu.edu.cn) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218349
--- Comment #3 from Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) ---
(In reply to Kane Ch'in from comment #2)
> That works! Thank you for your efforts.
Thank you for the confirmation!
I found above link is expired, let me attach the lore one for who wants check
it
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218769
Bug ID: 218769
Summary: fsck seems unable to solve corruption
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
Bug ID: 218770
Summary: fsck seems unable to solve corruption
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #1 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 306205
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306205&action=edit
fsck
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218769
Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #2 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) ---
*** Bug 218769 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|ANSWERED|CODE_FIX
Regr
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #5 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #4)
> On 4/24/24 12:21 PM, Tor Vic wrote:
> >
> > I can confirm the constant fsck issue, and it was fixed in my case by
> > the following patch:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jaeg...@kernel.org
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #7 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Jaegeuk Kim from comment #6)
> Thank you for the report. It seems I need to reapply that patch indeed.
Does rc6 contain the reapplied patch?
--
You may reply to this email to a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #8 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
The problem persists in the released version of kernel 6.9
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #9 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) ---
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev&id=b864ddb57eb00c4ea1e6801c7b2f70f1db2a7f4b
is going to be merged in upcoming weeks and LTS probably will pick
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #10 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
I applied the patch to 6.9 and it works fine. I am a bit surprised that it is
not already applied to 6.9.1.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #11 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) ---
The patch is in the next pull request.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/f2fs/patch/zkumxs7pogimb...@google.com/
Once Linus pulled it, I can ask Greg to queue it in -stable.
--
You ma
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #12 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Jaegeuk Kim from comment #11)
> The patch is in the next pull request.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/f2fs/patch/zkumxs7pogimb...@google.com/
>
> Once Linus pulled it, I
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
Bug ID: 218870
Summary: F2FS mount/unmount results in invalid_blkaddr
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: norm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
--- Comment #1 from Patrik Plihal (patrik.pli...@gmail.com) ---
It seems to not occur in 6.8.9 (can be downgraded + fsck reissued), I missed
this info initially.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
Paul Gover (pmw.go...@yahoo.co.uk) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pmw.go...@yahoo.co.uk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
--- Comment #3 from Paul Gover (pmw.go...@yahoo.co.uk) ---
Created attachment 306325
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306325&action=edit
syslog showing the problem
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are rece
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jaeg...@kernel.org
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #13 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) ---
6.9.2 will have the fix.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/commit/?id=b863827181d80ae33f822dc74d32e377737858c2
--
You may reply to this email to add
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
Karol Kosek (k...@serenityos.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@serenityos.org
-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
--- Comment #6 from George Sofianos (geo...@sofianos.dev) ---
I did try 6.9.2 (on Arch Linux) and still the same issue. Looking at the
commits
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/commit/?id=95d316e2c24a447e2b692
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #14 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
Thank you!
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218770
--- Comment #15 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) ---
correction; 6.9.3-rc1 has the fix.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
--- Comment #7 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) ---
Yeah.. I just saw that Greg queued it in 6.9.3-rc1.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
--- Comment #8 from Paul Gover (pmw.go...@yahoo.co.uk) ---
Just tried 6.9.3.
Appears the fix is now in and working - at least, I booted twice with a short
fsck, not the full works - so I'm currently a happy bunny. Thanks.
--
You may reply to th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218870
Patrik Plihal (patrik.pli...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #49 from YuDong Zhang (mtw...@gmail.com) ---
This problem doesn't seem to appear anymore after 5.18.15
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #50 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 301543
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301543&action=edit
dmesg log
After a month of happy living (see #47) it got me again.
$ uname -a
Linux xxx
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #51 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Today f2fs_gc got it again just few hours after upgrade to fresh Arch:
Linux xxx 5.19.1-arch2-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:06:13 +
x86_64 GNU/Linux
What I have noti
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #52 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Please, share your experience - how do you deal with this problem?
I do 'sudo systemctl poweroff', but, it takes hour, so, after waiting for most
services down, I just press power butto
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #53 from bernd_b (bbutsche...@yahoo.de) ---
I'll patch kernel 4.19.1 with debug patch v2 and see if I'll get new debug
info.
So far, the safest for me is to run my system with kernel < 4.18.x
--
You may reply to this email to add a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #54 from bernd_b (bbutsche...@yahoo.de) ---
I patched kernel 4.19.1 with debug patch v2 but all I can see is that the
workload of the cpu goes up to 3.5G and immediately down to 0.8G, and this
about every 2 seconds, although there is n
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
bogdan.nico...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bogdan.nico...@gmail.com
--- C
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #56 from bogdan.nico...@gmail.com ---
Also, there is a another task hanging up with a call trace:
kernel: INFO: task mandb:13173 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
kernel: Not tainted 5.19.3-arch1-1 #1
kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sy
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216285
Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
Sebastian Goth (li...@sgoth.de) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||li...@sgoth.de
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216456
Bug ID: 216456
Summary: KASAN: use-after-free in check_index_in_prev_nodes
when mount a crafted f2fs image
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 5.19.X - 6.0-rc4
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216285
--- Comment #2 from Wenqing Liu (wenqingliu0...@gmail.com) ---
Thank you so much.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213089
Zachary Cook (zachcook1...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zachcook1...@gmail
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216285
Chao Yu (c...@kernel.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #58 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 301840
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301840&action=edit
f2fs debug patch log
Applied debug patch v2 to Arch Linux kernel at:
3245cb65fd91 2022-
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #59 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Please forgive my ignorance, I'm sure I'm getting it wrong.
How this 'goto repeat' supposed to break a cycle?
Here is a simplified code of f2fs_get_lock_data_page():
struct page *f2fs
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #60 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 301856
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301856&action=edit
dmesg log
Another debug v2 output. Continuation of #58 - without rebooting.
This one has
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #61 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 301868
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=301868&action=edit
dmesg log
Another 900 debug patch traces.
All on the same address:
f2fs_get_lock_data_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565
Zhiguo.Niu (zhiguo@unisoc.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Res
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208565
Zhiguo.Niu (zhiguo@unisoc.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You may r
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216542
Bug ID: 216542
Summary: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in
fs/f2fs/segment.c:reset_curseg() when mount and
operate on crafted image
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #64 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Running 6.0.1-arch2-1 for a few days. So far, so good!
(Previously, this problem occurred from twice a day to once in a two days.)
There were quite a lot of changes in f2fs sources in 6
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215235
alexwriter (alexwriter2...@gmail.com) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexwriter2...@gma
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #65 from bogdan.nico...@gmail.com ---
Unfortunately 6.0.1-arch2-1 didn't do the trick for me. I'm still experiencing
this bug, especially when my laptop is coming out of sleep.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You ar
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #66 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to bogdan.nicolae from comment #65)
> Unfortunately 6.0.1-arch2-1 didn't do the trick for me. I'm still
> experiencing this bug, especially when my laptop is coming out of slee
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #67 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Yes, sadly confirming, this bug happens on 6.0.2-arch1-1:
[Mon Oct 24 15:57:09 2022] INFO: task f2fs_ckpt-259:3:273 blocked for more than
122 seconds.
[Mon Oct 24 15:57:09 2022] N
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #68 from bogdan.nico...@gmail.com ---
The only reasonable solution that works for me in everyday use is to deactivate
the background garbage collector entirely. For reference, this can be done
using the background_gc=off mount option (
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #69 from Matteo Croce (rootki...@yahoo.it) ---
That's a terrible workaround.
Does it impact the SSD wear leveling algoritmh?
Can a periodic fstrim mitigate this?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #70 from bogdan.nico...@gmail.com ---
Well, if understand correctly, TRIM will still be issued on-demand when
segments are cleared. There's also an option background_gc=sync, which I assume
will block other I/O operations. Unfortunatel
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #71 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
Since the problem occurred with the 5.18 kernel, I assume there is something
wrong after that version. I think the analysis of the problem should start with
the changes that occurred with ver
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #72 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
I tried kernel 6.0.6, after 2 days the problem reoccurred :-(
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #73 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
just to try it out, I will now give background_gc=sync a chance
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the b
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #74 from Matteo Croce (rootki...@yahoo.it) ---
Hi all,
The only way to find where the issue is, is to bisect from the latest working
kernel to the first non working one
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are recei
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #75 from bogdan.nico...@gmail.com ---
Guido just pointed that out in #71: the issue appeared since 5.18
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #76 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Matteo Croce from comment #74)
> Hi all,
>
> The only way to find where the issue is, is to bisect from the latest
> working kernel to the first non working one
the last workin
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #77 from Matteo Croce (rootki...@yahoo.it) ---
Great. If you do a bisect, you will find the problem in, let's say, 14 steps.
Really worth a try.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216669
Bug ID: 216669
Summary: f2fs inconsistent node block when executing
f2fs_fill_super
Product: File System
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 5.10
Hardware: ARM
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #78 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
I tried background_gc=sync. It doesn't solve the problem...
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #79 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) ---
I just had some time to think of this issue, and suspect there was no time to
reschedule the cpu in the loop?
Can anyone try this change?
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
inde
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #80 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Jaegeuk Kim from comment #79)
I tried to apply it to kernel 6.0.8 but failed. I found the code at row 1313 so
I can try to apply there. But there is another identical code at ro
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #81 from Jaegeuk Kim (jaeg...@kernel.org) ---
I think 1313 would be enough to avoid this issue first.
3568 case is after submit IO which could have a chance to get another states.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #82 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Jaegeuk Kim from comment #81)
> I think 1313 would be enough to avoid this issue first.
> 3568 case is after submit IO which could have a chance to get another states.
Thank you
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #83 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
I tried this script to trigger the GC:
https://github.com/LLJY/f2fs-gc/blob/master/f2fs-gc.sh
It's been running for 10 minutes now, but it's stock to 2503 dirty segments on
the root partitio
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #84 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
this is the output
Performing GC on /sys/fs/f2fs/nvme0n1p3/
2589
2589
2503
2503
2503
2503
...
and a lot of 2503
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #85 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
I modified the script to run it on the partition on my choice. No problem with
the home and other partitions. It looks like something in root partition. May
be it is related to the bug?
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #86 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Jaegeuk Kim from comment #79)
Running this patch (and debug printk) on 6.0.8-arch1-1.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #87 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 303184
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=303184&action=edit
kernel log (with patch on data.c applied)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #88 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Guido from comment #87)
> Created attachment 303184 [details]
> kernel log (with patch on data.c applied)
After several days of use I still did not have the 100% cpu busy proble
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #89 from bogdan.nico...@gmail.com ---
I confirm the bug persists both with background_gc=on and background_gc=sync.
It's especially prone to manifest when the machine is idle for a long time. It
almost feels like the gc hangs because i
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #90 from Guido (guido.iod...@gmail.com) ---
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index a71e818cd67b..c351c3269874 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,7 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_lock_data_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #91 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 303300
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=303300&action=edit
debug patch with f2fs_io_schedule_timeout
(In reply to #79)
This debug patch adds f2fs_
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216050
--- Comment #92 from Yuriy Garin (yuriy.ga...@gmail.com) ---
Created attachment 303301
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=303301&action=edit
dmesg log for patch f2fs_io_schedule_timeout #91
As you see, there is a lot of lines "ba
1 - 100 of 743 matches
Mail list logo
