[PATCH] ncpfs in 2.3.30-pre5

make sure that no-one except user (and root :-( ) can read your current session info from kernel. Thanks for applying this. Best regards, Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL

VFS: Busy inodes after unmount...

open by some daemon, but... Thanks, Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] (*) I hoped that ramfs works. It probably does not :-(

Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)

On 15 May 00 at 21:56, Alexander Viro wrote: On Sun, 14 May 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 04:37:46AM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: devfs_unlink() does - especially in free_dentries(). Or you can get your kicks looking at the crap (sorry, Petr, but it _is_ crap

Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount...

On 15 May 00 at 22:00, Alexander Viro wrote: On Mon, 15 May 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: Hi Al, during last week I decided that I should retry my attempt to add NCP sessions support into kernel. My last attempts through adding NCP protocol family ended in some troubles because

Re: Proposal: int (permission*)(struct dentry *, int)

. By creating real dentries/inodes during readdir (and caching them for some time period) some operations are now twice as fast as before - for example unlinking directories. Al, BKernelJanitorFH Petr Vandrovec

Re: [PATCH][CFT] dcache-ac10-M1 - dcache threading

atomic, why limit them to 31 bits only? (also, smp sparc has only 24-bit atomic values, but it does not matter here, as it is signed, so underflow is catched correctly anyway) Best regards, Petr Vandrovec

Re: [RFC] fhandle implementation.

RANGE" to other namespaces... do we really want this) :-( Thanks, Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[PATCH] VFAT short names in 2.4.0-test5-pre[3,4]

? Thanks, Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -urdN linux/fs/vfat/namei.c linux/fs/vfat/namei.c --- linux/fs/vfat/namei.c Mon Jul 24 09:34:50 2000 +++ linux/fs/vfat/namei.c Mon Jul 24 09:38:51 2000

Re: smbfs-mount flags

ncpfs behavior for 2.5.x... Best regards, Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i_blocksize, long long i_size and conversion size to blocks

syscall) or what is correct action? I can hardcode shift value into code because of block size on ncpfs is always 512 bytes, but I just want to know... Thanks, Petr Vandrovec