I'd be interested in taking such a feature but this isn't the list to
discuss it.
Pacemaker is not a Linux-HA project.
Try http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 23:41, Mark Hamzy wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a feature to add system health metric
Hello,
I am working on a feature to add system health metrics to HA. With this
information, HA could failover nodes away from hardware that might have
problems.
The following is a short description of what we want this new feature to
do.
Feature Name: Health monitoring support
Purpose:
Thanks Lars
I used resource stickiness to overcome my problem.
> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:46:23 +0200
> From: l...@suse.de
> To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Failover is not working as expected
>
> On 2009-04-22T13:29:10, sachin patel wrote:
>
> > I try putting up p
On 2009-04-22T13:29:10, sachin patel wrote:
> I try putting up pacemaker on redhat 5 and 5.2 but gui didn't work proerly
> and it worked great on 4.7 so decided to go that route
The version you have chosen will _not_ work great. Please, do not use
it, or at least do not ask for support for it ;
On 2009-04-22T05:35:24, Alan Robertson wrote:
> I have asked tummy.com to restore the web site to a working state as it was
> before.
Wow, you stepped down as a project leader and still make such
administrative decisions without consulting the community.
Or rather, you _did_ actually ask me a
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
As I have already communicated to to the actual people running the
project, the old wiki site (minus the horribly out-of-date and
misleading version 2 information) can be restored at any time.
Well, as a new user I have to say that the old site was horribly
confusing, an
On 2009-04-22T15:01:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 13:35, Alan Robertson wrote:
> > I have asked tummy.com to restore the web site to a working state as it was
> > before.
> Alan,
>
> You don't work here anymore, you gave up the right to dictate what
> happens to the proje
fsalas wrote:
> Hi, I'm quite new to clustering and HeartBeat, but as far as I know, a very
> nice packages.
>
> Well, here is my problem, I'm willing to setup a cluster for an small
> enterprise that will have several services located in virtual machines, to
> make it simpler, let's say we have f
I try putting up pacemaker on redhat 5 and 5.2 but gui didn't work proerly and
it worked great on 4.7 so decided to go that route
> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:58:50 +0200
> From: l...@suse.de
> To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Failover is not working as expected
>
> On
Alan,
You don't work here anymore, you gave up the right to dictate what
happens to the project quite some time ago.
As I have already communicated to to the actual people running the
project, the old wiki site (minus the horribly out-of-date and
misleading version 2 information) can be restored
I have asked tummy.com to restore the web site to a working state as
it was before.
There was in fact no reason to have made this change now - despite
what the tiny little web site said, and it was made without
consultation to the project management beyond Lars (that is 2/3 of
project lea
Quoting Alan Robertson :
I have asked tummy.com to restore the web site to a working state as it
was before.
There was in fact no reason to have made this change now - despite what
the tiny little web site said, and it was made without consultation to
the project management beyond Lars (that is
On 2009-04-21T20:55:25, sachin patel wrote:
> I am running 2.1.3 on Redhat 4.7
2.1.3 is way too buggy. You definitely want to upgrade.
Regards,
Lars
--
SuSE Labs, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name every
On 2009-04-20T14:07:10, Steve Kwee wrote:
> I have the same problem/question. The logfiles on the machine with the DC
> contain more information than on the other nodes (is that right ?)
Yes, but not all of the information from the other nodes, either. (ie,
the logs from the resource agents, LRM
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 22:55, sachin patel wrote:
>
> I have finally setup four system A B C D
> I have six resource group each is lvm, filesystem, nfs and ip
>
> when I stop heartbeat on a system whole group fails over to some other system.
> Problem is that with this resource group other resour
15 matches
Mail list logo
