Re: [Linux-ha-dev] incorrect diff of sysinfo.txt

2010-09-22 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:50:53PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: running debian 5.0.6 and cluster-glue 1.0.6-1~bpo50+1, hb_report's analysis.txt shows: Diff sysinfo.txt... --- /root/move_ftp_group/wc01/sysinfo.txt 2010-09-22 12:17:21.0 +0200 +++

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]The evasion of the probe error for pgsql.

2010-09-22 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Hideo-san, On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 04:43:35PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Serge, This is good. Thanks, Hideo. Thanks!! Let a development version please reflect this patch. Patch applied. Cheers, Dejan Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Serge Dubrouski

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]The evasion of the probe error for pgsql.

2010-09-22 Thread Serge Dubrouski
Thanks, Dejan - There was one more little patch for pgsql to replace: ocf_run $quietrun su $OCF_RESKEY_pgdba -c $* with ocf_run $quietrun su $OCF_RESKEY_pgdba -c cd $OCF_RESKEY_pgdata; $@ earlier. Can you please apply that one too or you want me to resubmit it? Thanks. On Wed, Sep 22,

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]The evasion of the probe error for pgsql.

2010-09-22 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Serge, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:26:43AM -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote: Thanks, Dejan - There was one more little patch for pgsql to replace: ocf_run $quietrun su $OCF_RESKEY_pgdba -c $* with ocf_run $quietrun su $OCF_RESKEY_pgdba -c cd $OCF_RESKEY_pgdata; $@ earlier. Can

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] [PATCH]The evasion of the probe error for pgsql.

2010-09-22 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Serge, Hi Dejan, Thanks!! Hideo Yamauchi. --- Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote: Hi Serge, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:26:43AM -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote: Thanks, Dejan - There was one more little patch for pgsql to replace: ocf_run $quietrun su $OCF_RESKEY_pgdba

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] incorrect diff of sysinfo.txt

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:50:53PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote: running debian 5.0.6 and cluster-glue 1.0.6-1~bpo50+1, hb_report's analysis.txt shows: Diff sysinfo.txt... ---

Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker

2010-09-22 Thread Alain.Moulle
Hi Andrew, ok I'm convinced now. I'll change the configuration. Thanks Alain A bunch of filesystem guys and cluster guys got together and thought through all the corners cases[1] that were possible and decided that having a resource manager in charge of a cluster FS that was using an internal

Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker

2010-09-22 Thread Alain.Moulle
Hi Andrew, sorry to come again on this subject, I was about to switch to OCFS2 in Pacemaker but : For configuration , I'm using the documentation Oracle Cluster File System 2, I think it is always correct/valid ? It seems that o2cb/dlm need an external/sdb (with /dev/sdb2 partition) for

Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Alain.Moulle alain.mou...@bull.net wrote: Hi Andrew, sorry to come again on this subject, I was about to switch to OCFS2 in Pacemaker but : For configuration , I'm using the documentation Oracle Cluster File System 2, I think it is always correct/valid ?

Re: [Linux-HA] Configuration question

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Alain.Moulle alain.mou...@bull.net wrote: Hi, Suppose I have two stonith primitives configured on my two-nodes cluster, restofencenode0 and restofencenode1 with : location +INF for restofencenode0 on node1 location -INF for restofencenode0 on node0 location

Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker

2010-09-22 Thread Alain.Moulle
Hi again, I've have a look in the external/sdb device, it seems to be useful only if we don't use a by network fencing solution , so as I'm using fence_ipmilan, perhaps this shared device is not useful in my case , right ? Regards ALain ___ Linux-HA

Re: [Linux-HA] About OCFS2 and Pacemaker

2010-09-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Alain.Moulle alain.mou...@bull.net wrote: Hi again, I've have a look in the external/sdb device, it seems to be useful only if we don't use a by network fencing solution , so as I'm using fence_ipmilan, perhaps this shared device is not useful in my case ,

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat/Pacemaker Italian article series complete!

2010-09-22 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:04:37AM +0200, RaSca wrote: Hi all guys, Yesterday I've finally finished and published the last article of the Heartbeat/Pacemaker series. These are the links to the articles:

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat/Pacemaker Italian article series complete!

2010-09-22 Thread RaSca
Il giorno Mer 22 Set 2010 13:44:07 CET, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto: [...] Didn't understand a thing, but looks great :) LOL! Just one note, it caught my attention, a node preference is usually expressed in non-absolute terms and using a shorter syntax: location cli-prefer-share-a share-a

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat interfaces questions

2010-09-22 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:37:50AM -0300, Henrique Fernandes wrote: When i set heartbeat to do bcast in some interface, it does ok. But if i set to do bcast in 2 interfaces, it does ok also, the problem is, i want the heartbeat give up resoucers if it looses just one interface... it

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat interfaces questions

2010-09-22 Thread Henrique Fernandes
Ok, thanks, I am using heartbeat 2.1.3 on a CentOS release 5.5 (Final) And i using crm respaw, i guess it uses peacemaker. crm_mon and etc. So, i guess you are saying that is possible to do what i want, using constraint. Can you give me a litle more information about suject ? Maybe some where

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat interfaces questions

2010-09-22 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39:18AM -0300, Henrique Fernandes wrote: Ok, thanks, I am using heartbeat 2.1.3 on a CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Oh, please upgrade as soon as you can, version 2.1.3 is quite old and you won't get much support for it. Pacemaker is what used to be heartbeat v2.

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat interfaces questions

2010-09-22 Thread Henrique Fernandes
Here where i work, we try to use the distro release package, and the on centos is this version. =/ But thanks, i am gonna ready it now. []'sf.rique On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fmwrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:39:18AM -0300, Henrique Fernandes

Re: [Linux-HA] Interesting scenario, is there a solution?

2010-09-22 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 9/21/2010 10:06 AM, Steve Davies wrote: - Kill the master (A). - The slave (B) is coming up - Some transient issue prevents the RC scripts running on (B). - (B) backs down and requests to become slave again - (A) is down, so (B) never gets confirmation of its slave request. Nothing more

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat interfaces questions

2010-09-22 Thread Henrique Fernandes
Look, i am not getting it to work. I already made a pingd conective clone in all nodes. But now i can not get an location to work. Can you help me ? I set an constraint location Conectivity and this has resource, my loadbalancer group resources, The score is - infinity and the atribute is my

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat interfaces questions

2010-09-22 Thread Henrique Fernandes
Oh, i think i got it now! I guess i was setting the wrong name for the constraint, in the atrribute i was seeting the pingdresourcename, but it has to be only pingd right ? At least is working now. []'sf.rique On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Henrique Fernandes sf.ri...@gmail.comwrote: