Hi,
I just moved the use function in the network commands block.
Best regards,
Nhan
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 18:22 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:08:08AM +0200, Nhan Ngo Dinh wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:21 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:40:22AM +0200, Ulf wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if inux-ha-...@lists.linux-ha.org will receive this message, as
I'm not subscribed to.
It won't, you need to subscribe.
Can you please elaborate on the benefits this patch would bring.
Is it supposed to prevent a VG from
Hi,
May I suggest that you go with the devel version, because
crm_cli.txt was converted to crm.8.txt. There are not many
textual changes, just some obsolete parts removed.
OK, I got crm.8.txt from devel.
Each directory structure for Pacemaker 1.0,1.1 and devel is just a bit
different.
Does
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:01:24AM +0200, Nhan Ngo Dinh wrote:
Hi,
I just moved the use function in the network commands block.
Thanks. Please update from the repository in future and provide
patches instead.
Cheers,
Dejan
Best regards,
Nhan
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 18:22 +0200,
Hi Junko-san,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 06:42:52PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
May I suggest that you go with the devel version, because
crm_cli.txt was converted to crm.8.txt. There are not many
textual changes, just some obsolete parts removed.
OK, I got crm.8.txt from devel.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic de...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Junko-san,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 06:42:52PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
May I suggest that you go with the devel version, because
crm_cli.txt was converted to crm.8.txt. There are not many
textual changes,
On 2011-04-27 00:29, Darren Thompson wrote:
Florian
All good points.
Unfortunately I'm not a programmer, so have no idea how to setup a
'git repo' and currently have no facility to host it even if I knew how.
That's the point of github; they provide all that infrastructure for you.
It
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:01:40PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic de...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Junko-san,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 06:42:52PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
May I suggest that you go with the devel version, because
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic de...@suse.de wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:01:40PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic de...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Junko-san,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 06:42:52PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
Hello, I am using drbd (two primary) + heartbeat (auto_failback on). In this
Server1 has more hosts connected to this by presenting the following log:
Version 3.0.3-2 heartbeat. I changed the values #8203;#8203;in / etc / ha.d /
ha.cfg as below, but the problem continues keepalive 4 deadtime
Hi,
Dependence is made now when make rpm does cluster-glue on RHEL5 and RHEL6.
It is caused by stonith plugin of vcenter.
I want to invalidate dependence from vcenter to enable rpm installation even
if there is not VMware Toolkit.
Because dependence was made dynamically, I did not know a
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:41:12AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:12:55AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:46:06PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Hi!
I've two cluster-nodes, both running pingd (as a clone), to keep ressources
from starting on nodes which have not obvious connection to the network. The
ping-nodes are:
-appl01 (10.10.10.202)
-appl02 (10.10.10.203)
-Default GW (10.10.10.254)
Before shutting down
Il giorno Mer 27 Apr 2011 11:11:44 CET, Stallmann, Andreas ha scritto:
Hi!
I've two cluster-nodes, both running pingd (as a clone), to keep ressources
from starting on nodes which have not obvious connection to the network. The
ping-nodes are:
[...]
Any ideas?
Thanks for your help,
As far
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:11:44AM +, Stallmann, Andreas wrote:
Hi!
I've two cluster-nodes, both running pingd (as a clone), to keep ressources
from starting on nodes which have not obvious connection to the network. The
ping-nodes are:
-appl01 (10.10.10.202)
-
Hi Lars,
Hi Lars!
You are exercising complete cluster communication loss.
Which is cluster split brain.
Correct, yes.
If you are specifically exercising cluster split brain, why are you surprised
that you get exactly that?
Because ping(d) is supposed to keep ressources from starting on
Il giorno Mer 27 Apr 2011 12:04:57 CET, Stallmann, Andreas ha scritto:
Hi!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: RaSca [mailto:ra...@miamammausalinux.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. April 2011 11:28
As far as I remember the master suggestion was to use ping instead of pingd,
so... Try ping.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Stallmann, Andreas
astallm...@conet.de wrote:
Hi Lars,
Hi Lars!
You are exercising complete cluster communication loss.
Which is cluster split brain.
Correct, yes.
If you are specifically exercising cluster split brain, why are you
surprised that you
Hi Andrew,
According to your configuration, it can be up to 60s before we'll detect a
change in external connectivity.
Thats plenty of time for the cluster to start resources.
Maybe shortening the monitor interval will help you.
TNX for the suggestion, I'll try that. Any suggestions on
20 matches
Mail list logo
