On 2008-07-09T12:44:16, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming it comes out, 2.1.4 wont not include all the
fixes/enhancements from Pacemaker 0.6.
But 2.1.4 should have all relevant bugfixes to pacemaker, still; though
indeed not all of the enhancements.
Regards,
Lars
--
On 2008-07-08T13:11:53, Ciro Iriarte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ptest -D
Seems you thought about everything :D
Andrew did ;-)
I got a blank graph:
asusis-xen1:~ # ptest -L -D sprod
asusis-xen1:~ # cat sprod
digraph g {
}
asusis-xen1:~ # rpm -q heartbeat
heartbeat-2.1.3-22.1
That
On 2008-07-08T18:49:53, Ciro Iriarte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For group2 I need to make sure that the LUNs are available, the issue
is how do I do that?
Well, two answers -
You could indeed write a pseudo-RA which monitors the DM-MPIO devs, or
feed their status directly into the CIB from
On 2008-07-07T01:00:39, Ciro Iriarte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that graphviz is used, but this utility harvests the info,
something that graphviz can't do on its own.. I was just asking if
someone already worked on a utility that talks to the crm to make this
kind of graph.
ptest -D
On 2008-07-01T23:28:33, Hannes Dorbath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way with legacy V1 config to power off the other node
permanently on STONITH calls (no reboot)?
Short off modifying the code, no.
___
Linux-HA mailing list
On 2008-06-30T18:48:42, Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mori-san fixed this :)
See attached.
It seems that the process spawned by Heartbeat keep holding the crmd-lrmd
channel.
Thanks for the patch, merged!
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
On 2008-06-27T15:47:01, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A non-trivial amount of lost messages :-(
Now keep in mind that CTS keeps the cluster in a constant state of upheaval
and that this was an 8-node cluster.
I go one step beyond what you recommend and keep the logfile on the CTS
On 2008-06-25T11:30:54, Joe Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. What I failed to realize was that any cross-network dialog between
ha_logger and syslog via ha_logd was anyways asynchronous, and
whatever dialog between ha_logger and ha_logd is local inter-process
(independent from the network),
On 2008-06-24T04:12:48, Joe Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ha_logger -t ${HA_LOGTAG} $@
if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then
return 0!!! if successful
fi
where, if ha_logger fails then ha_log() attempts to write directly to a
logfile and to a debugfile. If ha_logger succeeds, ha_log()
On 2008-06-24T07:26:47, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Alan,
thanks for the time and effort you have put into Linux-HA in the past.
Without you, it would not be what it is today.
Mori-san, Dave, and myself will discuss and announce how to proceed
soon, I hope. We need to have some
On 2008-06-22T20:00:00, Ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... that it was in the official guide. It is in there, that's where I
picked it up from.
/usr/share/doc/manual/sles-heartbeat_en/SLES-heartbeat_en.pdf (page 143)
Ah, duh. That was auto-generated to from all meta-data. Our bad.
On 2008-06-24T07:26:47, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Alan,
thanks for the time and effort you have put into Linux-HA in the past.
Without you, it would not be what it is today.
Mori-san, Dave, and myself will discuss and announce how to proceed
soon, I hope. We need to have some
On 2008-06-21T03:00:11, Ciro Iriarte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Link: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1897
Probably the patch is not applied yet as there're no comments to the
report I'm using heartbeat-resources-2.1.3-22.1 from the build
service (also on
On 2008-06-22T11:14:15, Ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it's good enough for a product like SLES10SP2. At least I
think that's what we pay for (not to get into a situation like this). It
should have been marked or mentioned in the script's header that it's
experimental only.
On 2008-06-20T12:52:09, Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sfex relies on timing, yes, but with such considerable safety margins
Do we have any systematic method to analysis the safety margin already ?
If not, I'll not go with the considerable claim.
It depends; but I would think that 60
On 2008-06-19T08:50:24, Joe Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my mind, anybody who brings up Linux-HA or HA to talk about
a cluster manager means Heartbeat.
There is no confusion with Xen, or OSCAR, or Rocks.
I disagree, actually. Linux-HA and heartbeat are two different things,
and this
On 2008-06-19T22:52:55, Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True. It is possible to break sfex, but the probability that that
is going to happen is extremely low and could be due only to a
very pathological timing. One way to make this probability still
From my previous experience, I
On 2008-06-09T16:25:25, Florent DUTHEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One can see clearly in logs (when it comes to mount the first bind/ro
ressource:
Filesystem[2688][2718]: 2008/06/09_16:10:08 INFO: Running start for
/mnt/filer1/drivers on /var/ftp/labtech/labtech_drivers
On 2008-06-07T13:14:06, Michael Bristow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SLES 10 SP1 two node cluster.
I just updated Heartbeat from 2.0.8 to 2.1.3 on two SLES 10 SP1 servers.
After the update, I am no longer able to log into hb_gui. I get the message:
Can't connect to server 127.0.0.1.
Did
On 2008-06-04T10:50:04, Karel Brenkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In my 5 node ha2 cluster I'm using an ocfs2 volume.
Everything goes well but only 4 nodes actually mount the ocfs2 volume.
It turned out that I did not set the correct node slot count in
ocfs2console. So I thought (stupid
On 2008-06-04T13:11:27, Karel Brenkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I KNOW that i must change the number of node slots, but how do you do
that?
I've tried via ocfs2console and via tunefs.ocfs2 -N 5 then I get the
error as posted.
When you say offline can you be more specific, stop the HA2
On 2008-06-04T22:31:37, zhang july [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't worry. I find out, the command should be /usr/lib64/heartbeat/pengine
metadata.
I can see no-quorum-policy in the return results, which is supposed to
mean it supports by this version. But the logs still shown warning about
On 2008-06-05T01:37:13, zhang july [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars, sorry if I didn't make my questions clear to you.
The name I use in the configration is the same one in the pengine metadata
and the same in crm.dtd. But the log tells me that I use the deprecated
names. I prefer not to use
On 2008-06-04T11:05:38, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some virtual environments are notoriously bad at keeping time
(vmware for example). I think that sometimes ntp can't prevent
clock from jigger.
Clock drifting is not the same as the clock jumping backwards;
virtualization
On 2008-06-03T16:14:15, Nuno Covas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you sure? My idea was that HB calls ResourceManager verifyallidle
on init time, which just checks for non-idle resources and logs the
result with CRITICAL tag, but HB doesn't stop the resources once
started..
You're right, my
On 2008-05-30T16:07:47, Michael Schwartzkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
tolle Sache, Kompliment!
Ich habe mal ins Beispielkapitel geschaut:
- Der Aussage, daß man bei der Auswahl nicht so viel Augenmerk auf
Qualität legen muss, würde ich nicht unterschreiben - nur durch
On 2008-05-28T15:59:38, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going with crm. In fact didn't find a pacemaker package in the
installation media (still and integrated bundle for SLES?
right - changing the packaging structure in a service pack wasn't
considered acceptable for customers
On 2008-05-30T20:07:24, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. I apologize. I _meant_ to send that to Michael personally, hence
the German. That was not intended.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB
On 2008-04-15T18:36:12, Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
Another request;
Would it be possible to include the following patch in release 2.1.4?
http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/6307bb091d02
That was already in, yes. Thanks!
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs,
On 2008-04-16T20:34:42, HIDEO YAMAUCHI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dejan,
It's strange that hb_report fails to produce good backtraces. How
did you get them from the command line?
I used a hb_report -f 09:00 -u root /root/mast_slave_emg2 command-line.
Hi Hideo,
I think Dejan was
On 2008-04-16T17:53:20, Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This test relates to these issues.
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1822
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/dev/rev/7edc6bc1557b
It seems that the fix is included to pacemaker/dev not stable...
On 2008-04-16T20:57:08, Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for annoying.
The last attached was something wrong, so check this one.
Hi Junko,
any ideas as to why the current code doesn't work for you?
Does the patched version work to actually _build_ the plugins?
For example, you add
On 2008-04-16T14:10:05, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will help the problems which are posted into Bugzilla 1814,
for all platform not only ppc.
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1814
I suppose that you mean the patch which is attached by Mori-san
On 2008-04-11T13:55:04, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Lars mentioned yesterday, the reason for 2.1.4 is to allow time for some
additional project changes (both managerial and technical).
Part of these changes are to split the, currently monolithic, Heartbeat
project into
On 2008-04-11T16:05:35, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* heartbeat-core (alternate name: cluster-core, lha-core)
This project would contain all the pieces relevant to the operation of a
single node.
Conceptually, the project would include:
- clplumbing (including
On 2008-04-11T18:10:13, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True. It's there only because of CRM. It still however depends on
ha.cf and logd.cf. It could be useful with v1 too, but right now
it probably depends on both. There'll have to be some code
changes to support the new layout.
Hi all,
the Linux-HA project is undergoing some changes, as you've noticed. Not
all of them have gone as well as expected, and it hasn't stabilized
yet.
Under guidance with Alan, the project members have met and decided to
change the governance of the project in the future. This will be
On 2008-04-08T06:56:25, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- RAs should sign in with it for the processes they want monitored,
instead of listing the processes in the procd configuration section
(means it gets decoupled from the CIB further). The RAs could write a
record to
On 2008-04-09T06:43:13, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever principles make sense for the specific RA - according to
instance attributes specified, the current role etc. The RA really knows
best.
Right, but that doesn't mean that they know user best. As I see it a
user
On 2008-04-08T19:32:58, Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I need to set a rather huge dead time of 1200s, but the initial dead time is
supposed to be of 120s or less. However, heartbeat tries to be
schoolmasterly and doesn't want to accept my settings:
deadtime 1200 # time
On 2008-04-09T20:26:02, Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think there is another bug in heartbeat, though. There is simply no
reason for heartbeat to wait $deadtime on initial startup of the heartbeat
services, when it knows all heartbeat nodes are are up.
If I at least could
On 2008-04-07T16:26:25, William Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hearbeat 2.1.3 on ubuntu 8 beta
I have two nodes and an OCF ip resource(plus DRBD and a mailserver).
When I put the node with all my resources into standby, all resource
except the ip resource (and the mail server dependant on
On 2008-04-05T12:22:39, Brian Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is sound advice, but CentOS's spec file is the same as the
heartbeat project's spec file. Were I to report to CentOS, any
patch developed would be pushed upstream to the HA project, or so
I would hope.
The RPMs shown to
On 2008-04-04T17:34:04, Junko IKEDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am running one test for a split brain like this;
(1) start Heartbeat (node-a/node-b)
(2) run Dummy resource on node-a
(3) down the interconnect LAN - a split brain
(4) stop Heartbeat (only node-b)
It might be just a
On 2008-04-03T13:59:36, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any crm* program is significantly slower on a non-DC node
regardless of whether something's happening in the cluster. It's
always been like that.
Hm, I've not personally observed that in my test cluster, or at least
not
On 2008-04-02T13:00:59, Abraham Iglesias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
i'm trying to implemente my snmp mib module to get every resource failcount
in the cluster. I'm surprised that the crm_failcount query to get the
failcount for a resource takes 2-3 seconds. Then, for 8 resources in
On 2008-03-22T02:37:13, Joe Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, I believe a loud Happy Birthday is in order
for Alan's brainchild and all the fine people he
gathered to give it a proper ... development ? :-) ...
and to help Heartbeat lead it's little HA revolution
in the world of open
On 2008-03-21T13:46:23, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am tring to setup ha in VE of OpenVZ.
After I started heartbeat, Log file show some errors:
Mar 21 13:41:35 cluster-dev1 heartbeat: [16236]: ERROR: Unable to set
scheduler parameters.: Operation not permitted
How can I fix these
On 2008-03-21T13:24:36, Szasz Tamas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use the cibadmin command to update, replace, delete resources in my cib
file. When I add a new resource, and view the result in crm_mon, the new
resource is succesfully added to the group, but when I view the cib file,
there isn't
On 2008-03-19T21:06:57, Atanas Dyulgerov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When to expect working quorumd? Are you planning to fix it in the next
release?
Probably not. The next release will focus on restructuring the packages
plus bugfixes only - though I may be wrong, I'm reasonably sure.
Is the
On 2008-03-18T14:05:45, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then my other questions is: Who supports current Heartbeat packages
suitable for Pacemaker and where I can get sources for them with
appropriate .spec files?
We'll provide that soon again. And in fact, the build service
On 2008-03-07T17:15:10, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OS: Debian Etch 4.0r3
Kernel: vanilla kernel 2.6.24.3
DRBD: 8.2.5
Heartbeat: 2.1.3
I was testing fail-overs between two nodes: fs01 and fs02. I've
alternated rebooting the nodes several times. I saw the errors below
show up in
On 2008-03-06T11:03:05, Luis Motta Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All four machines are the same CentOS 5 (final), all four machines are
using the same package set and where installed from the same DVD copy.
They literally share the same hardware, under VMware, and everything
else is virtual
On 2008-03-05T00:36:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I know, but this was actually the question, right? How can I force
all resources to move to the other node? and thats the purpose of this
command. I have to admit that I don't use drbd and I am not familiar with
master/slave devices. I
On 2008-03-03T17:10:10, David Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if any patch causes any trouble, feel free to back it out; they should
all be independent of each other. But preferably do so in an amended form
that includes a comment about why the original code was the way it was.
Hi David,
On 2008-03-01T15:35:10, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try it with --enable-pretty - it wraps gcc to make the build less noisy
and, well, more pretty. (The longish gcc lines are only shown when an
error actually occured.)
BTW, David, I'm pretty sure your latest change has broken
On 2008-03-03T16:50:52, Luis Motta Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a obviously fairly embarrassing bug, it's pretty complicated to
understand... :(
Explanations and pointers to reading material are welcome.
I'm not quite sure what you need; this is a bug in a date calculation
code being
On 2008-03-03T15:59:30, Luis Motta Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally, I've investigated my connectivity between the two nodes, and
everything seems fine on the network layer: I can see the other machine
(both sides) and there is no packet filtering firewalls running on them
(and there
On 2008-02-29T20:36:27, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://lists.linux-ha.org/pipermail/linux-ha/2008-February/030537.html
Many thanks for sharing this. I was not aware of it and it seems
to be important.
Fixed in pacemaker's latest release, I think.
Regards,
Lars
--
On 2008-02-29T11:19:50, David Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So while I'm visiting this, is there any reason not to simplify this right
down to the usual 'automake' behaviour?
That obscure comment said ...auto-built but not auto-cleaned. Does
anyone know why is it necessary to avoid this
On 2008-02-29T15:39:07, David Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if you can pretty it up and --enable-pretty still works, sure.
No, I don't particularly want to get sidetracked into its insides. I was
simply wondering why, from the configure/make perspective, it seems to be
a special case.
I
On 2008-02-27T11:45:45, Wayne Carty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea after testing again today the problem re-surfaced. The services start up
in the following order
ip
nfsboot
nfsserver
You also want the IP address up last.
Rationale: if the IP is up but the NFS server isn't yet, the clients
On 2008-02-26T12:46:46, Wayne Carty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solved the problem by reducing the resource timeout from 20s to 5s
That is very unlikely to solve any problem, rather it will introduce
spurious errors.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
On 2008-02-27T17:18:32, Sebastian Reitenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your conclusions are more or less the same, I had.
However, I'll create a bug report later. unfortunately, still no idea how it
happened. We removed the duplicate entries, replacing the CIB
(cibadmin -R -o resources),
On 2008-02-26T11:19:36, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know. ccdv is apparently a tool to help with reading
compiler output. I've never used it.
It pretties the compiler output. Try it with --enable-pretty=yes ;-)
The error looks like a compiler issue, explicitly casting
Hi all,
is anyone actually using the quorum daemon?
My assessment seems to suggest that it is not workable in any scenario;
but maybe I have missed something?
If not and I'm right, I am afraid that users might actually deploy it,
thinking it solves something and then be very upset when it fails
On 2008-02-21T18:28:45, Michael Schwartzkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to give it a try if somebody could explain me how it works.
That's the problem, I don't see how you can use it to build a working
and reliable configuration ;-)
___
On 2008-02-21T18:28:00, Adrian Chapela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am having troubles with resource monitoring. It only runs well some
seconds, then monitoring stops and the log says:
tengine[23994]: 2008/02/21_18:22:10 info: match_graph_event: Action
mysqld-child:0_monitor_2
On 2008-02-21T14:35:30, Doug Lochart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So now I am walking through my ha.cf with crm off (yes I want to get
this working in version 1 then convert my haresources to cib format
afterwards).
I don't think this approach is going to make you very happy. v2 is quite
On 2008-02-21T15:08:52, Doug Lochart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after the negotiating phase. Alert someone about this incident.
pri-lost echo pri-lost. Have a look at the log files. | mail -s
'DRBD Alert' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
This just tells me that this node was primary and
On 2008-02-19T12:33:04, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to my knowledge, the folks from suse made some heavy modification
to ocfs2 to remove this behavior. i once tried to incorporate their
patches into the then current vanilla kernel, but failed mainly because
of my lack of
On 2008-02-19T12:11:26, Sebastian Reitenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there ordered is set to false. I have the group running, and when I then
e.g. want to stop the resource D2, then D3 stops too. Only when I change
collocated to false, then D3 keeps running when I stop D2.
Seems to be
On 2008-02-19T15:49:28, Sebastian Reitenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Make rsc 'from' run on the same machine as rsc 'to'
If rsc 'to' cannot run anywhere and 'score' is INFINITY,
then rsc 'from' wont be allowed to run anywhere either
If rsc 'from' cannot run anywhere, then 'to' wont
On 2008-02-18T14:13:27, DAIKI MATSUDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently testing the development tree of Heartbeat and Pacemaker.
And I found they are alomost working well, but hb_gui on mgmtd
provided Pacemaker-Python-GUI does not work. Because, as errased the
part for mgmt from Heartbeat
On 2008-02-18T15:57:15, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But there is a problem. In the environment not installed mgmtd, the
heartbeat failes at the first.
What fails? Compilation? Heartbeat should be aware of the mgmtd
only insofar as to manage the process (the respawn
Hi all,
at the http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/ bugzilla, which is
also used by the Linux HA and openAIS project, we have just created a
Pacemaker product.
Please use this for filing all CRM/Pacemaker related bugs going forward,
as Pacemaker is the vehicle for future bugfixes and
Hi Alan,
you have set yourself as the new default owner for all Linux HA related
CRM issues.
I assume this means you'll take care of shepherding them over to the
Pacemaker product, or take care of their resolution?
Seriously, why was that done, we have made clear that we'd continue to
support
On 2008-02-14T22:39:13, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew said in reply to a bugzilla which I posted around the time
he created the pacemaker project that the bugs should be filed
there. I guess that what Alan did was a reaction to that.
Yeah, well, that was Andrew's intent,
On 2008-02-14T14:17:05, Nikita Michalko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heartbeat[5612]: 2008/02/14_09:47:59 WARN: Managed /usr/lib/heartbeat/cib
process 5630 exited with return code 1.
heartbeat[5612]: 2008/02/14_09:47:59 EMERG: Rebooting system. Reason:
/usr/lib/heartbeat/cib
Someone
Hi all,
at the http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/ bugzilla, which is
also used by the Linux HA and openAIS project, we have just created a
Pacemaker product.
Please use this for filing all CRM/Pacemaker related bugs going forward,
as Pacemaker is the vehicle for future bugfixes and
On 2008-02-09T10:15:47, Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GUI needs to do more things than just talking to CIB. For example,
when the admin wants to know why a resource fails on node A, someone
has to do log analysis on node A then. So I'd prefer to have a
indirect layer in-between here
On 2008-02-09T10:55:57, Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Making it web or not will not change the fact that CIB is harder to
understand than RHCS. I vote for a web based gui also, but won't
expect it to be more friendly then haclient.
The key trick is to only show the complexity the user
On 2008-02-09T10:34:39, Xinwei Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When watching the status of HA, we normally don't care about which
resources are good. Instead, we only care about which resource is
failed, which should started but stopped, blahblah.
A new monitor view of GUI is needed here ;)
On 2008-02-08T10:50:31, Eddie C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pen 8080 host1:80 host2:80
This makes it ideal work as an RA, because the load balancer (ok its a
proxy but close enough) can fail over to any node without having to
worry about synchronizing configuration files.
You could do
On 2008-02-07T10:45:00, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saying Requires: pacemaker doesn't seem like a good idea though
True, people who wish to run v1 only don't need Pacemaker installed.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products
On 2008-02-07T19:00:55, Thomas Glanzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to write a script similiar to pingd that is spawnd and
populates a value in the cib that I can build a rule on. What do I have
to do to obtain the above. Concrete questions are:
- What do I have
On 2008-02-07T19:11:26, Thomas Glanzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to do a Cluster-IP Setup with SLES 10. A few things are
unclear for me. With ClusterIP you have one IP address that is shared on
two or more nodes. It useally uses a multicast mac address. Both nodes
see
On 2008-02-07T16:33:48, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is very strange. Are you sure that you're running bash and
not dash? It's such a mishmash with all those xxshes. I'm off to
check that dash thing.
Why not simply specify #!/bin/bash explicitly?
Other scripts require it
On 2008-02-07T16:26:10, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The documentation is rather scarce, I'm afraid. The current GUI
is based on python and, if you speak python, you could take a
look there.
Another option would be to just invoke external programs such as
crm_mon,
On 2008-02-07T22:43:50, Thomas Glanzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello again,
here comes by cib.xml for a clusterip. But the ressource stickiness is not
working for me. When I shoutdown ha-2, the two clone instances stay on ha-1.
Any ideas? Before sending this e-mail I used the following
On 2008-02-06T16:28:41, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There don't seem to be any (I think we exhausted the testing discussion)...
are you waiting for me to do it?
Sure, feel free to; at least I have no objections.
I wonder if we could add a Recommends/Requires: pacemaker or
On 2008-02-06T13:45:47, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most things seem to be running, but the 3s timeout for rsc_winbind_2 seems
very low and rsc_clamd_2 seems to have trouble stopping.
There's also this:
Resource Group: filter_group_1
rsc_winbind_1 (lsb:winbind):
On 2008-02-06T15:11:28, Tao Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running the heartbeat 2.1.2
Core:
#0 0x003b9602e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#1 0x003b9602fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#2 0x003efe80bc90 in crm_abort () from /usr/lib64/libcrmcommon.so.1
#3
On 2008-02-06T08:58:46, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. If there is enough demand, then we can just make the equivalent of
ocf-shellfuncs for that language.
autoconf makes this relatively straight forward, you just supply the
template and it'll fill in the values.
Actually
On 2008-02-04T17:39:22, Mike Toler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feb 4 15:46:11 nfs_server1 lrmd: [4570]: info: rsc:drbd0:0: start
Feb 4 15:46:11 nfs_server1 drbd[4850]: INFO: r0: Using hostname node_0
Feb 4 15:46:11 nfs_server1 lrmd: [4570]: info: RA output:
(drbd0:0:start:stdout)
On 2008-02-05T14:55:35, Andreas Mock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Does this mean I can rely on $OCF_ROOT being set and on
$OCF_ROOT/resource.d/heartbeat/.ocf-shellfuncs being a shell snippet to
execute that sets the listed variables?
Yes, OCF_ROOT is a OCF-mandated setting. The .ocf-shellfuncs
On 2008-02-04T21:59:44, Tadashiro Yoshida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand Andrew will release Pacemaker, and Alan will release
Heartbeat, individually.
Now we are standing on a starting point of this discussion ;-)
Someone should testify the combination of these packages in the
On 2008-02-04T14:23:14, Tadashiro Yoshida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am confused completely. I have thought integrated product of
Heartbeat and PaceMaker will be tested and released in the SUSE's
Build Service.
We will build packages of both heartbeat and PaceMaker, yes.
And, of course, we
On 2008-02-04T12:58:47, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not quite true. The cluster cannot get direct confirmation from
the device which pulled the plug, but we're talking probabilities here.
stonith is an all-or-nothing proposition.
Nothing ever is ;-) We're just willing
On 2008-01-29T10:31:35, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to propose the following changes to happen in the next
heartbeat release, which I'd name 2.2.0 because of them.
... If noone has any remaining objections, I suppose we could go ahead
701 - 800 of 1358 matches
Mail list logo
