Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 3/28/07, Aleksandar Lazic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Die 27.03.2007 13:45, Alan Robertson wrote:
>> >Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Does anybody know who have done this because there is a company which
>> >> need more then the 16 servers and are able to help?
>
On Mit 28.03.2007 16:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Please can you send me some infos about this companies, maybe offlist,
so that I can contact they, thanks.
SUSE might possibly be interested
- but you'd obviously have to be running SLES instead of RH :-)
Hm, why do you think ;-)
BR
Aleks
On 3/28/07, Aleksandar Lazic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Die 27.03.2007 13:45, Alan Robertson wrote:
>Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>> Does anybody know who have done this because there is a company which
>> need more then the 16 servers and are able to help?
>>
>> As far as I know they also want
On Die 27.03.2007 13:45, Alan Robertson wrote:
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Does anybody know who have done this because there is a company which
need more then the 16 servers and are able to help?
As far as I know they also want to pay for the help.
I know companies who could help this happen, a
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon 26.03.2007 18:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>
>> basically just the amount of testing we've done. we've had reports of
>> people using more than 16
>
> Does anybody know who have done this because there is a company which
> need more then the 16 servers a
On 3/27/07, Guy Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon 26.03.2007 18:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>
>> basically just the amount of testing we've done. we've had reports of
>> people using more than 16
>
> Does anybody know who have done this because there i
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon 26.03.2007 18:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>
>> basically just the amount of testing we've done. we've had reports of
>> people using more than 16
>
> Does anybody know who have done this because there is a company which
> need more then the 16 servers a
Hi,
On Mon 26.03.2007 18:50, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
basically just the amount of testing we've done. we've had reports of
people using more than 16
Does anybody know who have done this because there is a company which
need more then the 16 servers and are able to help?
As far as I know they
Got it. Thx. :)
tanghy
2007-03-27
发件人： Alan Robertson
发送时间： 2007-03-27 02:25:43
收件人： General Linux-HA mailing list
抄送：
主题： Re: [Linux-HA] why number of nodes < 16?
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 12:10 PM, tanghy wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Mar 26, 2007, at 12:10 PM, tanghy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am reading Alan's tutorial of Linux-HA.
>> I am wondering why it is said in the tutorial that number of
>> suppported cluster nodes is less than 16?
>> What causes it not able to extend to larger size?
>
> bas
On Mar 26, 2007, at 12:10 PM, tanghy wrote:
Hi,
I am reading Alan's tutorial of Linux-HA.
I am wondering why it is said in the tutorial that number of
suppported cluster nodes is less than 16?
What causes it not able to extend to larger size?
basically just the amount of testing we've don
tanghy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am reading Alan's tutorial of Linux-HA. I am wondering why it is
> said in the tutorial that number of
> suppported cluster nodes is less than 16?
> What causes it not able to extend to larger size?
The near-term bottleneck is an internal limit on packet size. The
bigge
Hi,
I am reading Alan's tutorial of Linux-HA.
I am wondering why it is said in the tutorial that number of suppported cluster
nodes is less than 16?
What causes it not able to extend to larger size?
Thx. :)
Tang Haiying
tanghy
2007-03-26
___
Linux-
13 matches
Mail list logo
