Hai Tao taoh...@hotmail.com schrieb am 23.05.2011 um 22:59 in Nachricht
bay156-w38e2c0bf103481109bd9deeb...@phx.gbl:
this might not be too close to HA, but I am not sure if someone has seem
this before:
I use a serial cable between two nodes, and I am testing the heartbeat with
:
Hi,
any chance to update to version 3?
2.1.3 is really very old buggy!
HTH
Nikita Michalko
Am Donnerstag 19 Mai 2011 19:25:54 schrieb 吴鸿宇:
Hi All,
I have a 2 node cluster. My intention is ensuring the VIP is always on the
node that has httpd running, i.e. if service httpd on the VIP
On 05/23/11 23:34, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:59:23PM -0700, Hai Tao wrote:
this might not be too close to HA, but I am not sure if someone has seem
this before:
I use a serial cable between two nodes, and I am testing the heartbeat with :
server2$ cat /dev/ttyS0
Il giorno Gio 19 Mag 2011 19:25:54 CET, 吴鸿宇 ha scritto:
Hi All,
I have a 2 node cluster. My intention is ensuring the VIP is always on the
node that has httpd running, i.e. if service httpd on the VIP node is
stopped and fails to start, the VIP should switch to the other node.
With the
Hi
Many thanks for this status. I suppose this is the same status on RHEL6 as
Suse is
likely to be in advance with regard to RHEL6 Pacemaker corosync
evolutions ?
Alain
De :Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.de
A : General Linux-HA mailing list linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Date :
Hi all,
as some of you saw in the last two weeks I've faced some problems in
configuring a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster on two Hetzner server.
The main problem about those cheap and very powerful servers is their
network management. For example, if you want to have a failover IP you
need to
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:43:50AM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
On 05/23/11 23:34, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:59:23PM -0700, Hai Tao wrote:
this might not be too close to HA, but I am not sure if someone has seem
this before:
I use a serial cable between two
Hi,
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 03:18:37PM -0700, Nulgor Wankevitch wrote:
hi,
heartbeat seems to be send udp on port 694 to the whole network segment,
Do you use ucast or bcast? With the latter, which is broadcast
it's of course expected. If it happens with the former, then you
must have
Hi,
thnk for reply, when use ucast things do not seem to work, the nodes are
able
to bring up the VIP but not any services. When using bcast things seem
to work correctly
but there is that broadcast problem, I would like to firewall the
broadcast and isolate
it to the local machine and 2nd
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:12:12AM -0700, Nulgor Wankevitch wrote:
Hi,
thnk for reply, when use ucast things do not seem to work, the nodes are
able
to bring up the VIP but not any services. When using bcast things seem
to work correctly
Wow! You really do have gremlins somewhere.
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:08:38AM +0200, RaSca wrote:
Hi all,
as some of you saw in the last two weeks I've faced some problems in
configuring a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster on two Hetzner server.
The main problem about those cheap and very powerful servers is
their network management.
Hello boys (and girls?)!
Building my resources incrementally made me debug the LVM RA: Syslog said
nothing, but the resource won't start.
As it turned out, the check whether a VG was activated is wrong: vgchange -a
seems to report an error if a VG without LVs was activated (It's completely OK
Il giorno Mar 24 Mag 2011 12:27:04 CET, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto:
Hi,
Hi Dejan,
[...]
# Read parameters
conf_file=/etc/hetzner.cfg
user=`cat /etc/hetzner.cfg | egrep ^user.*= | sed 's/^user.*=\ *//g'`
Better:
user=`sed -n 's/^user.*=\ *//p' /etc/hetzner.cfg`
Absolutely agree.
Il giorno Mar 24 Mag 2011 12:44:42 CET, RaSca ha scritto:
Il giorno Mar 24 Mag 2011 12:27:04 CET, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto:
[...]
P.S. Moving discussion to linux-ha-dev.
[...]
Sorry... I removed the wrong address and posted again on linux-ha :-(
--
RaSca
Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente è
ya, gremlins, very reassuring, thanks.
On 5/24/2011 2:42 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:12:12AM -0700, Nulgor Wankevitch wrote:
Hi,
thnk for reply, when use ucast things do not seem to work, the nodes are
able
to bring up the VIP but not any services. When
Fedora 14 lacks dlm-pcmk since it has been depreciated. Really
frustrating as whatprovides shows a file but yum install says nothing to
do without installing. Most of the existing quick start docs are
therefor inapplicable as they presume that you have dlm_controld.pcmk.
On 5/23/11 10:45 AM, Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de
wrote:
Eventually netgroups would be a solution once we had an LDAP server up
and running to provide the netgroups consistently. We are changing about
everything, so I have a hard time to find out where to start ;-)
Thanks for
On 05/24/2011 05:48 AM, Nulgor Wankevitch wrote:
ya, gremlins, very reassuring, thanks.
If the broadcast packets from host A are seen by host B, and unicast
packets from host A to host B are not seen by host B, then your universe
is governed by laws of physics we here are completely unfamiliar
I think you guys might have jumped the gun on me, why would you
assume it is not seen? I reported it will bring up the VIP but not
the services.
nulgor
On 5/24/2011 9:37 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 05/24/2011 05:48 AM, Nulgor Wankevitch wrote:
ya, gremlins, very reassuring, thanks.
If the
On 05/24/2011 02:56 PM, Nulgor Wankevitch wrote:
I think you guys might have jumped the gun on me, why would you
assume it is not seen? I reported it will bring up the VIP but not
the services.
The only way I can vaguely imagine that possibly happening is if cib
isn't propagated to the other
it seems like cib is on both nodes as I am able to view both from crm_mon
and crm configure show shows the same info, am I correct?
On 5/24/2011 2:02 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 05/24/2011 02:56 PM, Nulgor Wankevitch wrote:
I think you guys might have jumped the gun on me, why would you
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:10:25PM -0700, Nulgor Wankevitch wrote:
it seems like cib is on both nodes as I am able to view both from crm_mon
and crm configure show shows the same info, am I correct?
This does not lead anywhere.
You complained that broadcast broadcasts.
Well, that's the nature
Hi all,
Fabio suggested to make one last release before introducing the
new common OCF provider.
I'm scrutinizing now the LF bugzilla.
Is there anything else that needs to be done for the Heartbeat RA
set? IIRC, there were recently updates proposed for pgsql,
postfix, mysql(?).
Cheers,
Dejan
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:08:38AM +0200, RaSca wrote:
Hi all,
as some of you saw in the last two weeks I've faced some problems in
configuring a Corosync/Pacemaker cluster on two Hetzner server.
The main problem about those cheap and very powerful servers is
their network management.
On 05/24/2011 12:10 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi all,
Fabio suggested to make one last release before introducing the
new common OCF provider.
I'm scrutinizing now the LF bugzilla.
Is there anything else that needs to be done for the Heartbeat RA
set? IIRC, there were recently updates
On 2011-05-24 13:38, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
postfix:
fghaas reviewed my code. i tried to catch him on irc on how to
progress with his comments.
I tried to catch you that same day; you weren't there. How about falling
back to the mailing list, or using github's line note interface to
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:44:42PM +0200, RaSca wrote:
Il giorno Mar 24 Mag 2011 12:27:04 CET, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto:
Hi,
Hi Dejan,
[...]
# Read parameters
conf_file=/etc/hetzner.cfg
user=`cat /etc/hetzner.cfg | egrep ^user.*= | sed 's/^user.*=\ *//g'`
Better:
user=`sed
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:38:58PM +0200, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
On 05/24/2011 12:10 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi all,
Fabio suggested to make one last release before introducing the
new common OCF provider.
I'm scrutinizing now the LF bugzilla.
Is there anything else
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:41:53PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:44:42PM +0200, RaSca wrote:
Il giorno Mar 24 Mag 2011 12:27:04 CET, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto:
Hi,
Hi Dejan,
[...]
# Read parameters
conf_file=/etc/hetzner.cfg
user=`cat
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fmwrote:
Hi all,
Fabio suggested to make one last release before introducing the
new common OCF provider.
I'm scrutinizing now the LF bugzilla.
Is there anything else that needs to be done for the Heartbeat RA
set? IIRC,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:10:17PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:41:53PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:44:42PM +0200, RaSca wrote:
Il giorno Mar 24 Mag 2011 12:27:04 CET, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto:
Hi,
Hi Dejan,
Hi Serge,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:14:21AM -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fmwrote:
Hi all,
Fabio suggested to make one last release before introducing the
new common OCF provider.
I'm scrutinizing now the LF
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic de...@suse.de wrote:
Hi Serge,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:14:21AM -0600, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Hi all,
Fabio suggested to make one last release before
postfix:
fghaas reviewed my code. i tried to catch him on irc on how to
progress with his comments.
mysql-proxy:
i basically want to implement the monitoring from the mysql ra
for OCF_CHECK_LEVEL -gt 0. this is still on my todo list.
should i create another fork on github for these
34 matches
Mail list logo
