Lars,
you are right, and I saw that my guess to use /proc/stat was wrong. top is slow
in getting the current CPU usage. So basically I wondered if you need the CPU
usage at all. If you'd switch to load, you could get it a lot faster.
To be honest: I wondered what HealthCPU would monitor about
On Friday 04 February 2011 14:35:35 Ulrich Windl wrote:
Lars,
you are right, and I saw that my guess to use /proc/stat was wrong. top is
slow in getting the current CPU usage. So basically I wondered if you need
the CPU usage at all. If you'd switch to load, you could get it a lot
faster.
Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 02:35:35PM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Lars,
you are right, and I saw that my guess to use /proc/stat was wrong. top is
slow in getting the current CPU usage. So basically I wondered if you need
the CPU usage at all. If you'd switch to load, you
Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com schrieb am 03.02.2011 um 13:09
in
Nachricht 201102031309.04931.mi...@clusterbau.com:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 12:35:34 Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
I'm starting to explore Linux-HA. Examining one of the monitors, I think
things could be made
On Thursday 03 February 2011 16:00:54 Ulrich Windl wrote:
Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com schrieb am 03.02.2011 um
13:09 in
Nachricht 201102031309.04931.mi...@clusterbau.com:
On Thursday 03 February 2011 12:35:34 Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
I'm starting to explore
Soffen, Matthew msof...@iso-ne.com schrieb am 03.02.2011 um 16:35 in
Nachricht e847bfef193361409d48010ec8ace3bc01703...@exchangebe.iso-ne.com:
Morning All,
Please also keep in mind that /proc/stat is ONLY in Linux and Linux-HA
despite the name is also used on FreeBSD and Solaris.
Hi!
Good
