Here is the proposed 2.0.5 schedule.
Please plan accordingly...
2.0.5 code freeze 14 April, 2005
2.0.5 tentative release date21 April, 2005
I would prefer that all features for 2.0.5 be minor ones - bug fixes
only would be preferred.
--
Alan Robertson
Guochun Shi wrote:
David Lee wrote:
I propose applying the attached patch early next week. But I would very
much like someone who knows the area both to sanity-check it and to
run-time check it, please.
Axiom: Part of the heartbeat ethos is that compiler warnings should be
regarded as potent
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:42:59PM -0600, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Malcolm Locke wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >For the information of anyone who needs to, here is a patch to the spec
> >file of heartbeat-2.0.4-1.src.rpm to allow building on Fedora Core 5.
> >I'm afraid I haven't tested the resulting packa
Diego Leider wrote:
Hello,
I'm running Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 on my i386 systems. On the
ultramonkey website i can't seem to find rpm of the latest heartbeat
version 2.0.4. Can i use the rpm's for the i586 architecture on my i386
systems? Can anybody explain the difference between i386, i586
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-03-27T19:52:06, Robert Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone seen this problem before?
That people do not explain the problem they have and fail to attach
logfiles, and that they post to the list instead of opening a bugzilla?
Or that they post text/htm
Sun Jiang Dong wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 3/29/06, Sun Jiang Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I'm pretty sure this doesn't need to be an error. In fact I doubt it
needs to be logged at all.
stonithRA is a virtual resource based on SOTNITH plugin, normally under
/
Cao Shuxun wrote:
> Here is my puzzledom.
>
> I installed hb2.0.4 on my slackware 10. And it worked well.
> But I found its master process bound to all my host's interface.
>
> like:
> netstat -npl | grep heartbeat
> udp0 0 172.30.31.75:6950.0.0.0:*
> 29007/heartbe
Malcolm Locke wrote:
Hello,
For the information of anyone who needs to, here is a patch to the spec
file of heartbeat-2.0.4-1.src.rpm to allow building on Fedora Core 5.
I'm afraid I haven't tested the resulting packages extensively, but they
do at least build.
Malc
--
On 4/4/06, Diego Leider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I specified "use_logd" in ha.cf. I attached /var/log/messages from one
> of the machines. Is this what you mean?
>
> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 13:30 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On 4/4/06, Diego Leider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I changed t
On 4/4/06, Diego Leider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed type="Apache" to lower case but I get the same result.
> Even when I specify " id="WebServerApache" type="apache">" in the cib.xml file i get the same
> result.
can you post updated logs?
___
I changed type="Apache" to lower case but I get the same result.
Even when I specify "" in the cib.xml file i get the same
result.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] heartbeat]# crm_resource -V -W -r WebServerApache
crm_resource[19576]: 2006/04/04_13:06:48 WARN:
mask(unpack.c:unpack_rsc_op): Processing failed op
(
On 4/4/06, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Diego Leider wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to do something as simple as starting the apache webserver on one
> of the machines running heartbeat.
> When i run the command "crm_resource -V -W -r WebServerApache" i ge
On Apr 4, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Diego Leider wrote:Hi,I want to do something as simple as starting the apache webserver on oneof the machines running heartbeat.When i run the command "crm_resource -V -W -r WebServerApache" i get crm_resource[9607]: 2006/04/04_12:03:11 WARN:mask(unpack.c:unpack_rsc_op)
Hi,
I want to do something as simple as starting the apache webserver on one
of the machines running heartbeat.
When i run the command "crm_resource -V -W -r WebServerApache" i get
crm_resource[9607]: 2006/04/04_12:03:11 WARN:
mask(unpack.c:unpack_rsc_op): Processing failed op
(WebServerApache_m
Here is my puzzledom.
I installed hb2.0.4 on my slackware 10. And it worked well.
But I found its master process bound to all my host's interface.
like:
netstat -npl | grep heartbeat
udp0 0 172.30.31.75:6950.0.0.0:*
29007/heartbeat: ma
udp0 0 0.0.0.0:
15 matches
Mail list logo