On 11/27/2010 04:19 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:03:23AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
But until then, you could probably already have implemented your
original proposal in the cumulative man hours spent writing and reading
this thread, and I'm sure I will get used. So
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:16:54AM -0700, Alan Robertson wrote:
I was talking about a half-dozen or so nodes. Not to /implement/ a
cloud, but to /run in/ a cloud someone else implemented.
I know. Of course.
Maybe we should have stuck closer to the original subject ;)
Yes, as was my first
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:03:23AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
But until then, you could probably already have implemented your
original proposal in the cumulative man hours spent writing and reading
this thread, and I'm sure I will get used. So please, just go ahead.
tztztz.
Though possibly
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:18:27PM -0700, Alan Robertson wrote:
Hi,
I've been thinking about a new unicast communications plugin that would
work slightly differently from the current ucast plugin.
It would take a filename giving the hostnames or ipv4 or ipv6 unicast
addresses that one
the case or am I off base?
Thanks,
Bob
- Original Message
From: Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com
To: linux-ha-dev@lists.linux-ha.org
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 9:18:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Thinking about a new communications plugin
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:18:27PM
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:10:33AM -0800, Bob Schatz wrote:
I am curious.
What is driving the need for more than 32 nodes? Are many people doing that
or
planning on doing that?
In my experience, 80% of the people just want 2 nodes to work reliability
and
more than 4 nodes is just
Subject: Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Thinking about a new communications plugin
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:10:33AM -0800, Bob Schatz wrote:
I am curious.
What is driving the need for more than 32 nodes? Are many people doing that
or
planning on doing that?
In my experience, 80% of the people
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:43:05AM -0800, Bob Schatz wrote:
Lars,
Please take my opinions with a grain of salt. I am just trying to share my
experiences. I am not sure if they apply here.
I appreciate all of the hard work involved in LinuxHA and Pacemaker!
Just to tell you where I am
On 2010-11-22T14:18:27, Alan Robertson al...@unix.sh wrote:
Any thoughts about this?
http://kronosnet.org/
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes. --
Hi,
I've been thinking about a new unicast communications plugin that would
work slightly differently from the current ucast plugin.
It would take a filename giving the hostnames or ipv4 or ipv6 unicast
addresses that one wants to send heartbeats to.
When heartbeat receives a SIGHUP, this
10 matches
Mail list logo
