Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-09-01 Thread Chuck Hast
On 9/1/05, Ralf Baechle DL5RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:47:46AM -0500, Chuck Hast wrote: > > > > > > > > > http://www.escomposlinux.org/iarenaza/hamradio/m6pack/files/ax25-tools-0.0.8-m6pack.diff.bz2 > > > > > > I'm still contemplating if this should preferably b

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-09-01 Thread Ralf Baechle DL5RB
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 07:47:46AM -0500, Chuck Hast wrote: > > > > > > http://www.escomposlinux.org/iarenaza/hamradio/m6pack/files/ax25-tools-0.0.8-m6pack.diff.bz2 > > > > I'm still contemplating if this should preferably be done in userspace or > > in kernelspace ... > > > > Is there any

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-09-01 Thread Chuck Hast
On 9/1/05, Ralf Baechle DL5RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:46:09PM +0200, Iñaki Arenaza wrote: > > > > You could try EB6EBU's m6pack which is an application level solution > > > to the problem. > > > > Just a little correction. It's EB2EBU, not EB6EBU (otherwise Google >

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-09-01 Thread Ralf Baechle DL5RB
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 10:46:09PM +0200, Iñaki Arenaza wrote: > > You could try EB6EBU's m6pack which is an application level solution > > to the problem. > > Just a little correction. It's EB2EBU, not EB6EBU (otherwise Google > will not find my patch against ax25-tools-0.0.8 ;-) Sorry :-) > Y

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-08-28 Thread iarenaza
On Tue Jul 05 2005 - 21:12:22 EEST, Ralf Baechle wrote: > You could try EB6EBU's m6pack which is an application level solution > to the problem. Just a little correction. It's EB2EBU, not EB6EBU (otherwise Google will not find my patch against ax25-tools-0.0.8 ;-) You can get it at: http:

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
applied - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-07 Thread Ralf Baechle DL5RB
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:39:44PM -0500, Bill Vodall wrote: > > It's a strategy that allows attaching the TNC to any UNIX machine, > > even without AX.25 support. It's a hack but I was playing with it > > for a while when I ran out of interfaces. > > That could be VERY userful... Any more det

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Bill Vodall
> > It's a strategy that allows attaching the TNC to any UNIX machine, > even without AX.25 support. It's a hack but I was playing with it > for a while when I ran out of interfaces. That could be VERY userful... Any more details available? Thanks, Bill - WA7NWP - To unsubscribe from this l

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Ralf Baechle DL5RB
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:06:41PM -0400, Chuck Hast wrote: > Ralf, > What is lacking that would allow 6pack TNC's to be daisy chained? > By doing so we would be able to use a single serial port to support > multiple TNC's I have the documentation on how to wire the hardware > and that is no big d

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Chuck Hast
On 7/5/05, Ralf Baechle DL5RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:45:56AM -0600, Chuck Hast wrote: > > > Does 6pack still only handle 1 tnc under Linux or have you got it to do > > a ring of TNC's like the DOS one does? Sure would like to see that on > > Linux, would cut cost f

Re: [stable] [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Ralf Baechle DL5RB
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:26:06AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > * Ralf Baechle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Drivers really only work well in SMP if they actually can be selected. > > This is a leftover from the time when the 6pack drive only used to be > > a bitrotten variant of the slip driver.

Re: [stable] [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Chris Wright
* Ralf Baechle DL5RB ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Obviously, otherwise I'd not send such a patch :-) ;-) > cli/sti abuse etc. > 6pack was pretty much 2.0 or even pre-2.0 code before I started. > > Somehow I managed to strip the BROKEN_ON_SMP patch bit from the last set > of 6pack patches I sent,

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Ralf Baechle DL5RB
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:45:56AM -0600, Chuck Hast wrote: > Does 6pack still only handle 1 tnc under Linux or have you got it to do > a ring of TNC's like the DOS one does? Sure would like to see that on > Linux, would cut cost for us where we have multiple TNC's and want to > use a simple machi

Re: [stable] [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Chris Wright
* Ralf Baechle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Drivers really only work well in SMP if they actually can be selected. > This is a leftover from the time when the 6pack drive only used to be > a bitrotten variant of the slip driver. Hmm, it's been this way for quite a while, and users can still build

Re: [PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Chuck Hast
On 7/4/05, Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Drivers really only work well in SMP if they actually can be selected. > This is a leftover from the time when the 6pack drive only used to be > a bitrotten variant of the slip driver. > > Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

[PATCH] SMP fix for 6pack driver

2005-07-05 Thread Ralf Baechle
Drivers really only work well in SMP if they actually can be selected. This is a leftover from the time when the 6pack drive only used to be a bitrotten variant of the slip driver. Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kconfig |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletio