Hi Farid,
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:38:19 +0200, Farid Hammane wrote:
This patch fixes all coding style issues found by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Farid Hammane farid.hamm...@gmail.com
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c | 30 +++---
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15
Under certain rare conditions, I2C_STAT[13].RDR bit may be set
and the corresponding interrupt fire, even there is no data in
the receive FIFO, or the I2C data transfer is still ongoing.
These spurious RDR events must be ignored by the software.
This patch handles and ignores RDR spurious
Jean Delvare said the following:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:10:11 +0200, Michael Lawnick wrote:
Jean Delvare said the following:
One thing I forgot:
+ result =
i2c_check_clients(to_i2c_adapter(adapter-dev.parent), addr);
+
+ return result;
+}
As
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:08:16PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
Manjunatha GK wrote:
Under certain rare conditions, I2C_STAT[13].RDR bit may be set
and the corresponding interrupt fire, even there is no data in
the receive FIFO, or the I2C data transfer is still ongoing.
These
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:21:10PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
The issue was truly solved by the second patch in this thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/5436
Looks like i've got this in my i2c next.
Accidently, the first one was picked up. So, this patch adds the
The following changes since commit 01bf0b64579ead8a82e7cfc32ae44bc667e7ad0f:
Linus Torvalds (1):
Linux 2.6.34-rc5
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git for-linus/i2c
Arnaud Patard (1):
i2c-imx: fix error handling
Dan Carpenter (1):
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:40:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 01:04:57PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:21:10 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
The issue was truly solved by the second patch in this thread:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
The timeout value is in jiffies, so it should be using HZ, not a plain
number. Assume with HZ=100 '100' means 1s here and adapt accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de
Cc: Eric Miao
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 08:20:46AM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
The timeout value is in jiffies, so it should be using HZ, not a plain
number. Assume with HZ=100 '100' means 1s here and adapt accordingly.
Signed-off-by:
