On Sat, 19 Dec 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Asking linux-pm for help here: If we want to support RuntimePM for I2C
> clients, do we need to enable RuntimePM on the logical I2C adapter
> device (the bus master) which is already marked using
> pm_runtime_no_callbacks?
In theory you don't need to.
> > Asking linux-pm for help here: If we want to support RuntimePM for I2C
> > clients, do we need to enable RuntimePM on the logical I2C adapter
> > device (the bus master) which is already marked using
> > pm_runtime_no_callbacks?
>
> In theory you don't need to. But there are some advantages
Linus,
here is a set of "usual" driver bugfixes for the I2C subsystem. Please
pull.
Thanks,
Wolfram
The following changes since commit 1ec218373b8ebda821aec00bb156a9c94fad9cd4:
Linux 4.4-rc2 (2015-11-22 16:45:59 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
Hi,
> > Since commit 6ada5c1e1b077a ("i2c: Mark adapter devices with
> > pm_runtime_no_callbacks"), runtime PM on adapters turned into a no-op.
> > So, we can remove these calls.
>
> Won't this break i2c client devices that use runtime PM? Not sure
> if any cases of such client exist now, I'll
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:46:55AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 02:53:07PM +0100, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > On 15/12/15 19:14, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Since commit 6ada5c1e1b077a ("i2c: Mark adapter devices with
> > > pm_runtime_no_callbacks"), runtime PM on
