Hello,
Yeah, it seems promise has some problem with 3G link. Cc'ing Mikael
Pettersson and quoting whole body for him. Mikael, does this look familiar?
Tomi Orava wrote:
Hi Tejun,
I've been trying to find a solution for a long time for quite a similar
libata errror messages as shown in
Hello,
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:52:33 +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
I've got a box here based on current Debian Stable.
It's got 15 Maxtor SATA drives in it on 4 Promise TX4 controllers.
Using kernel 2.6.21.x it shuts down, but of course with a huge clack as 15
drives
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Yes, this is familiar. Several people have reported problems with
Seagate's 7200.10 disks in 3Gbps operation on sata_promise.
Unfortunately the error reports don't really give a clue as to what
the root cause is.
I used to be able to forcibly trigger similar errors
Hi Jeff,
Ok ... second part of my problem. Where should I look in trying to debug
the below problem...
Regards
Nigel
Jun 18 07:59:56 nigel-m2v kernel: ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0
SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
Jun 18 07:59:56 nigel-m2v kernel: ata2.00: cmd
We have a series of machines that use CF as a boot media. Since upgrading to
2.6.20 (tried .9-.14), system will boot (from the flash media) but then fail
to initialise the same media. Here is the dmesg from 2.6.20.14:
ata_piix :00:1f.2: version 2.00ac7
ata_piix :00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1
Hi,
Yeap, kernel will automatically downgrade to 1.5Gbps after several failures.
is there also a boot-time option to force 1.5Gbps right from booting up?
Florian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Yeap, kernel will automatically downgrade to 1.5Gbps after several
failures.
is there also a boot-time option to force 1.5Gbps right from booting up?
Nope.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a
Hi,
The controller being ich8, I'm pretty sure it isn't a driver problem.
I think so, too. The Intel chipsets have shown to be very good in the past.
Do the errors occur on all four drives? Also, if things work after
speed is downgraded to 1.5Gbps, it doesn't really matter. There's no
Hi,
Maybe we need to limit link speed to 1.5Gbps for these drives on
sata_promise?
in our case, it's a
Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD1600YS-01S Rev: 20.0
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05
Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD3200YS-01P Rev: 21.0
Type:
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
The controller being ich8, I'm pretty sure it isn't a driver problem.
I think so, too. The Intel chipsets have shown to be very good in the past.
Do the errors occur on all four drives? Also, if things work after
speed is downgraded to 1.5Gbps, it doesn't
Andrew_hall wrote:
We have a series of machines that use CF as a boot media. Since upgrading to
2.6.20 (tried .9-.14), system will boot (from the flash media) but then fail
to initialise the same media. Here is the dmesg from 2.6.20.14:
ata_piix :00:1f.2: version 2.00ac7
ata_piix
Hi Tejun,
Hmmm... Can you use a separate PSU to power two of the four drives and
see what happens? Just power up a PSU as directed in the following
webpage and connect two of the harddrives to the PSU.
http://modtown.co.uk/mt/article2.php?id=psumod
thanks for that link, we will try that
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:09:49 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:52:33 +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
I've got a box here based on current Debian Stable.
It's got 15 Maxtor SATA drives in it on 4 Promise TX4 controllers.
Using kernel 2.6.21.x it shuts
Florian Effenberger wrote:
I don't know. Till now all the problem cases have been isolated to a
specific controller / drive combination (sata_promise and newer seagate
drives) or hardware configuration problem (most of them being PSU
issues), so I don't think we need such option yet. If you
Hi,
Nope, there's nothing to worry about.
okay, thanks a lot so far, it is good to know that developers are there
to help. ;-)
I will let you know how it turned out with the second PSU.
Florian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
FWIW, I'm seeing scsi layer accesses (cache flushes) after things
like rmmod sata_promise. They error out and don't seem to cause
any harm, but the fact that they occur at all makes me nervous.
That's okay. On rmmod, as the low level device (ATA) goes away first
just
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:26:11 +0900
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew_hall wrote:
We have a series of machines that use CF as a boot media. Since upgrading to
2.6.20 (tried .9-.14), system will boot (from the flash media) but then fail
to initialise the same media. Here is the dmesg
Hi,
I got a new laptop and I had a little problem that the DVD drive wasn't
recognized by
libata's piix driver (but the old IDE Subsystem found it!).
So, after adding the new pciid 8086:2850 it works!
But, I don't know if it's ich_pata_100 or ich_pata_133 since the
dvd/cd drives only goes up
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:20:06 +0200
Chr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a new laptop and I had a little problem that the DVD drive wasn't
recognized by
libata's piix driver (but the old IDE Subsystem found it!).
So, after adding the new pciid 8086:2850 it works!
But, I don't know if
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:20:06 +0200
Chr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a new laptop and I had a little problem that the DVD drive wasn't
recognized by
libata's piix driver (but the old IDE Subsystem found it!).
So, after adding the
Mikael Pettersson schrieb:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:28:44 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, it seems promise has some problem with 3G link. Cc'ing Mikael
Pettersson and quoting whole body for him. Mikael, does this look familiar?
Tomi Orava wrote:
Hi Tejun,
I've been trying to find a
I've got a hard lockup in the ide subsystem, probably
due to some irq spew or something like that.
I've just bought a brand new Maxtor 320GB disk driver
for the insane price of $70 US to replace another
failing drive. It works well under light load;
I was able to copy about 60GB to it.
FYI: DID 2850 is the PATA IDE controller. Most likely, the laptop does not
have SATA drives and is running off of PATA.
The old IDE subsystem (piix.c) is where I added that PATA DID to.
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH8_6 0x2850 in pci_ids.h
Jason
-Original Message-
From:
I don't think we want to have a PATA controller DID added to the SATA IDE mode
driver. This DID is already in the PATA piix.c driver.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ide-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chr
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 6:20 AM
To:
DID 2850 is not a SATA controller. This is an ICH8 PATA controller DID.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ide-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michal Piotrowski
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 2:36 PM
To: Maurizio Monge
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
FYI: DID 2850 is the PATA IDE controller. Most likely, the laptop does not
have SATA drives and is running off of PATA.
The old IDE subsystem (piix.c) is where I added that PATA DID to.
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH8_60x2850 in
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:28:44 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Yeah, it seems promise has some problem with 3G link. Cc'ing Mikael
Pettersson and quoting whole body for him. Mikael, does this look
familiar?
Tomi Orava wrote:
Hi Tejun,
I've been trying to find a solution for a long time for
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:50 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc:
On Monday, 18. June 2007, you wrote:
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
Jason
please bottom post!
about your concerns:
see: pci_id.h
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH6_19 0x266f
#define
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at
that point.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Thanos Kyritsis wrote:
Hello,
starting with kernel 2.6.21 and up to kernel 2.6.22-rc4, I'm having the
following problem:
/etc/rc.d/rc.local contains the following:
/usr/sbin/hdparm -q -d1 -q -u1 -q -c1 -q -k1 /dev/hda
/usr/sbin/hdparm -q -d1 -q -u1 -q -c1 -q -k1 /dev/hdb
/usr/sbin/hdparm -q
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
I hate outlook...
As PATA is going away, hopefully this will be a moot point.
yes, PATA served well, but Intel has already done the necessary
ceremony for PATA's funreal. ICH8M is maybe really the last
chipset with a native IDE interface.
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at
that point.
ide_dma_timeout_retry() in ide-io.c
prints the hdc: DMA Timeout error then calls
HWIF(drive)-ide_dma_end(drive);
which returns, and then calls
hwif-INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) which is needed as an argument to ide_error()
But this hangs! -- The INB never returns.
Now: hwif-INB =
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:00:33 -0700
Gaston, Jason D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we want to have a PATA controller DID added to the SATA IDE
mode driver.
ata_piix drives both
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:57:16 -0700
Gaston, Jason D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
Nope and drivers/ide is going away (eventually)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:27:04PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
ide_dma_timeout_retry() in ide-io.c
prints the hdc: DMA Timeout error then calls
HWIF(drive)-ide_dma_end(drive);
which returns, and then calls
hwif-INB(IDE_STATUS_REG) which is needed as an argument to ide_error()
So what do you suggest? (I could buy an alternate ide controller,
and hope that goes away, or just buy a different hard drive. But
that's beside the point).
The DMA timeout itself could be all sorts of things - crap driver, crap
hardware, PCI bus contention, noise, problem disk, phase of the
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:04:41PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
If you've got a nice repeatable problem
Very highly repeatable :-(
please try using the libata
driver. That handles the error paths differently and doesn't try a FIFO
drain which might matter in this case I guess.
Dohh, yes, of
For some reason, mwdma doesn't work in libata now. I'm not sure why
tho. Alan, can you enlighten us?
No idea at all. All my hardware is still happy. 2.6.20 is an old
kernel
however so it does predate the fixes you did for ata_piix mode setup ?
Old - yes, but more stable in all other
ata1.00: configured for MWDMA2
For some reason, mwdma doesn't work in libata now. I'm not sure why
tho. Alan, can you enlighten us?
If the CF is having trouble with DMA, how do I specifically turn off DMA
only on this one bus?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hello
I've got a sil3124 card which doesn't seem to use the full speed of my drives.
---
ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xe085 ctl 0x bmdma 0x irq 17
ata2: SATA max
Andrew Hall wrote:
For some reason, mwdma doesn't work in libata now. I'm not sure why
tho. Alan, can you enlighten us?
No idea at all. All my hardware is still happy. 2.6.20 is an old
kernel
however so it does predate the fixes you did for ata_piix mode setup ?
Old - yes, but more
(I sent this to linux-RAID, then actually read it and noticed that the
crash was in the IDE code. Reposting here.)
This is 2.6.22-rv4 + linuxpps, on a venerable and stable 32-bit system
(P3 processor, 400BX motherboard, ECC RAM). That drive has been giving me
hassles from time to time, but is
44 matches
Mail list logo
