Re: Command line limit for an arbitrary program?

2003-06-14 Thread Shaul Karl
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:28:28AM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote: From a quick glance on the kernel include files (unfortunately I'm not an expert enough on the Linux kernel to give you an authoritative answer) I see that 32 pages are allocated for arguments. At 4K per page, that comes out to a

Re: Ximian Desktop 2 Released; Evolution 1.4.

2003-06-14 Thread Eliran Gonen
Gilboa Davara [EMAIL PROTECTED]: www.ximain.com (http://www.ximian.com/products/desktop/) Best of all, evolution 1.4 has also been released: ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/ximian-evolution/ (Time to dump the 1.3.92 beta version :)) Any idea when would they release debian packages/support ?

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 released

2003-06-14 Thread Shlomo Solomon
On Saturday 14 June 2003 01:25, Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani wrote: The title says it all, you know where to get it :) Am I missing somethhing here? - Mandrake 9.1 shipped with 2.4.21 months ago, so why is this news? :-) -- Shlomo Solomon http://come.to/shlomo.solomon Sent by KMail (KDE 3.1) on

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 released

2003-06-14 Thread Hetz Ben Hamo
On Saturday 14 June 2003 17:47, Shlomo Solomon wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 01:25, Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani wrote: The title says it all, you know where to get it :) Am I missing somethhing here? - Mandrake 9.1 shipped with 2.4.21 months ago, so why is this news? :-) The so called 2.4.21

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 released

2003-06-14 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Shlomo Solomon wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 01:25, Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani wrote: The title says it all, you know where to get it :) Am I missing somethhing here? - Mandrake 9.1 shipped with 2.4.21 months ago, so why is this news? :-) It was not based on the

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 released

2003-06-14 Thread Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think Mandrake 9.1 shipped with a 2.4.21pre kernel, and applied some patches to make it usable as a stable kernel... On Saturday 14 June 2003 20:47, you wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 01:25, Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani wrote: The title says it all,

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 released

2003-06-14 Thread Eli Billauer
Hello All, I downloaded 2.4.21 from the Israeli mirror, and untarred it, just to find that all files belong to user group 573, rather than root. User 573 doesn't exist on my system. I changed the ownership on all the files to root, and I think others should take this precaution as well. Or

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 released

2003-06-14 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:18:03PM +0200, Eli Billauer wrote: Hello All, I downloaded 2.4.21 from the Israeli mirror, and untarred it, just to find that all files belong to user group 573, rather than root. This is true also for 2.4.20 (and most (all?) other versions). If you do tar

keymap switching

2003-06-14 Thread Shai Bentin
I have setup keyboard switching to work in my XF86 config file. (ALT+Shift + turning on scroll lock). My system boots level5 and runs the KDM user chooser. At this point my keyboard switching works great. After I log in either to KDE Session or Gnome Session, this option goes away and I can't do

Re: keymap switching

2003-06-14 Thread Andre E. Bar'yudin
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:01:28PM +0200, Shai Bentin wrote: I have setup keyboard switching to work in my XF86 config file. (ALT+Shift + turning on scroll lock). My system boots level5 and runs the KDM user chooser. At this point my keyboard switching works great. After I log in either to

Re: keymap switching

2003-06-14 Thread Dittigas
This is the case in did and so far I've not seen any inteligent explanation of why both GNOME and KDE's kyeboard switcher can't accomplish what they ar set to do. There's an alternative switcher for GNOME called gswitchit, which I've tried once but wasn't too impreseed.. In KDE I've noticed

Re: Command line limit for an arbitrary program?

2003-06-14 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 04:30:14PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:28:28AM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote: [snip] BTW, if you search google a bit more, you will find out that HURD (and maybe others?) do not have any limit. So if you want to be portable, do not assume

Re: Kernel 2.4.21 released

2003-06-14 Thread Gilboa Davara
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 00:27, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 18:23, Gilboa Davara wrote: Here's my problem. The RedHat's 9.0 2.4.20 kernel is patched to it's teeth (NPL threads, drivers, etc). I wonder if RedHat will be kind enough to get a patched 2.4.21 kernel for RH8/9