So I had to reboot my (330 day uptime...) machine. I couldn't even
cleanly shut it down, because the NFS unmount never finished.
RH Magazine suggests some trick with rpciod, but I haven't tried it yet.
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/005mar05/departments/tips_tricks/
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Hi, I don't want to start a distro war, but I am looking for the distro
(x86 32 bit) that has the best USB device support. It does not have to
be leading edge, or easy to install, or have a great graphic front end
or installer.
All I am really concerned about is
On Apr 6, 2005 10:16 AM, Amit Aronovitch wrote:
I'm not sure this is exact and it's certainly not complete (I use
none of the above).
For the latest, most exact data, I recommend distrowatch.com .
Specifically, use the search page:
http://distrowatch.com/search.php
HTH,
--
Offer Kaye
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, list.
I'm having a weird problem with an MD raid. The configuration is as
follows: 16 SCSI disks connected in pairs into MD raid-0. /dev/sda and
/dev/sdb form /dev/md0, etc. The machine is dual xeon running rh9.
I'm running a stress test on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonid Podolny wrote:
Hi, list.
I'm having a weird problem with an MD raid. The configuration is as
follows: 16 SCSI disks connected in pairs into MD raid-0. /dev/sda and
/dev/sdb form /dev/md0, etc. The machine is dual xeon running rh9.
I'm
Quoting Ira Abramov, from the post of Mon, 28 Mar:
then comes the next pain... the backup system is CA, and they have
nothing out for X86-64 yet. I have no idea how SuSE and RH encapsulate
32-bit support on the new AMD64 systems, but I think I can guess a 32
bit backup agent module and the
Quoting Leonid Podolny, from the post of Wed, 06 Apr:
After reading my own letter, I think that my point is not very clear.
When I run the same test on 16 separate disks (i.e. no RAID) all the
disks work at about 90% and the overall result is significantly (~70%)
better. Thus, it looks like
Quoting Eran Tromer, from the post of Wed, 06 Apr:
RAID1 you double the amount of writes, whereas in RAID0 you balance the
number of reads and writes between more than one disk,
files stored far apart on the (logical) disk. In RAID1 there are two
copies of the data, each with an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonid Podolny wrote:
I'm having a weird problem with an MD raid. The configuration is as
follows: 16 SCSI disks connected in pairs into MD raid-0.
Ira Abramov wrote:
well, if you are writing more than one copy of each sector, of course
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eran Tromer wrote:
That's true in regard to writes, but for reads RAID1 is faster. For
example, consider a system doing extensive reads concurrently from two
files stored far apart on the (logical) disk. In RAID1 there are two
copies of the data,
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:07:00 +0300
From: Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ely Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *nix sysadmins for tehila
Hi Ely. Can you please send an email to linux-il saying that Tehila is
looking for *nix sysadmins?
Resumes can be
Hi ILUG List Members,
Tk Open Systems has a Cisco 2500 frame relay router and a Motorola
Vangaurd 320 frame relay router, both in good working condition, that are
looking for new homes, preferably non-profit institutions, destitute
students, starving Talmudic scholars, etc. Contact me off-list.
Hi Linux-il subscribers,
Tk Open Systems Ltd. has six gutted PC's available for trade or give-away.
The PC's are working motherboards with working P90 to P120 CPU's, mini
tower cases, power supplies, floppy drives, a little RAM, a few have
200MB disks, no cards to speak of.
Would like to
One of my clients is looking for a Linux programmer.
No big experience is required, however knowledge of C/C++ is a must,
experience with Linux development tools (gcc, gdb, make) is required.
Knowledge of network protocols is also required.
Embedded systems (not necessarily linux) is considered
14 matches
Mail list logo
