On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote:
Dan Kenigsberg and I are proud to present version 1.2 of Hspell, the free
Hebrew spell-checker and morphological analyzer.
I am, as ever, in bewildered awe of this kind of commitment to the project
and the ability
Hi,
I create a partition in Linux (on a dual boot Fedora/windows 7 machine) by
mkfs.ntfs /dev/sda6
The operation succeeded ok.
I can see the NTFS partition in linux by fdisk -l.
However, when I booted into windows 7 on this machine I could not
see that partition in windows explorer nor in disk
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Dan Shimshoni danshi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I create a partition in Linux (on a dual boot Fedora/windows 7 machine) by
mkfs.ntfs /dev/sda6
The operation succeeded ok.
I can see the NTFS partition in linux by fdisk -l.
However, when I booted into windows 7
I have recently came across a surprising difference between 32 and 64
bit platforms (we are, of course, talking about Intel: X86 vs.
X86_64/AMD64).
On 32 bit platforms, if you try to link object files not compiled with
-fPIC (say, a static library), the compilation passes. On further
On 03/03/2012 7:38 PM, Dan Shimshoni wrote:
Hi,
I create a partition in Linux (on a dual boot Fedora/windows 7 machine) by
mkfs.ntfs /dev/sda6
The operation succeeded ok.
I can see the NTFS partition in linux by fdisk -l.
However, when I booted into windows 7 on this
Hi Orna, Nadav,
Google wont stay with any outdated version and Nadav wont succeed in suing
Google for anything. AGPL is an own-goal in the truest sense. Google will
simply reverse engineer Nadav's code in a clean room envrionment, if they
think that they need it. And if they don't, as you
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Re: Announce: Hspell 1.2:
I am, as ever, in bewildered awe of this kind of commitment to the project
and the ability to maintain and continue to develop it in the face of
temporary difficulties like day jobs, families, and so on.
Thanks. Indeed
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012, Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda wrote about Re: Announce: Hspell
1.2:
Regarding the license - AGPL sounds like a great idea, but It is hard for
me to imagine
gmail, for example, with a powered by Hspell button. I am afraid they
will prefer to keep
using the outdated version 1.1
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012, Jonathan Ben Avraham wrote about Re: Announce: Hspell
1.2:
Nadav and Dan under the GPL license. If the licence had been at
least LGPL the code would have found its way into OpenOffice, which
would have given OpenOffice an advantage in the Hebrew market and
might have
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012, Shachar Shemesh wrote about shared object from object
files not compiled with -fPIC - 32 vs. 64 bit:
compiled with -fPIC). Still, I'm wondering why the difference. I don't
see any hardware difference between the platforms that makes this trick
(which, like I said, is
Hi Nadav,
It's a question of how you look at the world - the way it should be or the
way it is. The way it is (or was), there was no way either LibreOffice or
OpenOffice would ever be GPL and so Hspell did not get in. You can claim a
moral victory but the user community is poorer as a result.
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 10:56:20PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
Frankly, I never understood why OpenOffice not just GPL. Why the
insistance to allow Sun and IBM to create proprietary versions of it?
OO.o was triple-licensed GPL+LGPL+MPL. The MPL is generally more liberal
than the LGPL - each
As usual, because Hspell is open-source, proprietary software writers
have the option to fully evaluate every aspect of Hspell, and its
suitability for their product, before they decide to use it. But if they
do use it, they should indeed not use the AGPL but rather negotiate a
special
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.ilwrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012, Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda wrote about Re: Announce:
Hspell 1.2:
Regarding the license - AGPL sounds like a great idea, but It is hard for
me to imagine
gmail, for example, with a powered by
14 matches
Mail list logo
