[Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
http://www.microsoft.comitem=linux@3573468885/original.html -- Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +972(9)9717330 | Fax: +972(9)9717334 | Cel: +972(54)756701 Kagoor Networks ltd | http://www.kagoor.com | To unsubscribe,

Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
http://www.microsoft.comitem=linux@3573468885/original.html My web connectivity is awful today, so I couldn't check this link, however, this is known to be a HOAX: the prefix of a URL before the @ sign is passed to the site right after it as useename/password. In the aforementioned URL

Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: http://www.microsoft.comitem=linux@3573468885/original.html I hate to spoil it for others, but... Is this a valid URL? Mozilla thinks it is, and displayed it properly. But when it passed through squid, squid gave me a DNS error. -- Tzafrir

Of URL format (was: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Shachar Shemesh
the meaning of the url: IP - 3573468885 (212.254.206.213) Address inside the URL - original.html it also mentions that you should login. The user is www.microsoft.com. I am not sure what the item=linux part is all about. I think it is considered part of the username. IIRC, password is

Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002, Dan Kenigsberg wrote about Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-): http://www.microsoft.comitem=linux@3573468885/original.html My web connectivity is awful today, so I couldn't check this link, however, this is known to be a HOAX: the prefix of a URL before

Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread mulix
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 05:49:27PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: http://www.microsoft.comitem=linux@3573468885/original.html I hate to spoil it for others, but... Is this a valid URL? it's a valid url, just not the url most people think it

RE: Of URL format (was: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
The reason, I believe, that squid chokes on it is that it fails to DNS resolve 3573468885. calling gethostbyname() on such an address is perfectly valid, i wonder if/why squid doesn't do it. Might be a secutiy feature. Put tight hand tiny finger in mouthHackers like you are hard to

Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Ely Levy
that cause squid resolve the address before passing it and mozilla parse it. Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: http://www.microsoft.comitem=linux@3573468885/original.html

Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Alon Altman
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, mulix wrote: On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 05:49:27PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: http://www.microsoft.comitem=linux@3573468885/original.html I hate to spoil it for others, but... Is this a valid URL? it's a valid

Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-)

2002-03-11 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002, Alon Altman wrote about Re: [Humour] This is hilarious... ;-): it's a valid url, just not the url most people think it is. Well, no it isn't. From RFC1738: host The fully qualified domain name of a network host, or its IP address as a set of four